|
|
|
> I’ve just perused Daniel Williams Daniel's code, and it seems legit — I agree that the function “find_calibrations” will return the right thing -- if it used in the correct directory on the CIT LDAS cluster.
|
|
|
|
> Not sure if you want to hard-code the directory in to this script but, in case you don't have it, that's the H1 and L1 sub folders of
|
|
|
|
> https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~cal/uncertainty/O3C01/
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
> or
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
> /home/cal/public_html/uncertainty/O3C01/
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
> The calibration group's intent is for this to be a very permanent location for these files, and we have zero intent of changing them ever again in the future, so I expect a hardcoded path to be stable for a decade or more.
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
> Now, as far as what's left to do in terms of review, if you (Daniel Williams , Aaron Zimmerman , or Christopher Berry ) want a "just review what you've been asked to review," answer then I say we're done.
|
|
|
|
> If you want a "what's best for ensuring scientific integrity of our results" answer, then I would request a few example plots that each have
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
> the example event's calibration envelope,
|
|
|
|
> the envelope's GPS time, the Event's GPS time, and the time difference displayed on the plot, and
|
|
|
|
> the mimic of the envelope -- i.e. that which will actually be sampled -- computed by whatever process has been decided for O3b, which I think is a O1-O3a standard 5-point spline interpolation of the envelope.
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
> Just for, like 3 events as sanity check to make sure that the envelope time is indeed within an hour of the event time, and that the spline interpolation of the envelope is sane. |
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |
