Follow-up from "Probability of a BNS merger in O4b"
The following discussion from !260 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@leo-singer started a discussion: This is a very long sentence. Please break into shorter sentences or otherwise restructure for readability.
-
It is not clear from context why this section is here. I think that we all know that it is because people are surprised by the lack of BNS events so far in O4. Would you please add some introductory text to frame this issue? -
This section is very verbose and technical. Can you trim it and make it more readable for a general astronomy audience?
Edited by Om Sharan Salafia