-<09:42:49> "Becca Ewing": it looks like its different at the high snr end, is that expected or explained?
-<09:43:32> "stefano.schmidt": is there an online summary page for this run? I'm interested to compare this with my own offline runs, which gave weird recovery results
-<09:43:38> "ryan.magee": LR wise, i don't think anything beyond prior tweaks is expected.
-<09:42:49> "Becca Ewing": it looks like its different at the high snr end, is that expected or explained?
-<09:43:32> "stefano.schmidt": is there an online summary page for this run? I'm interested to compare this with my own offline runs, which gave weird recovery results
-<09:43:38> "ryan.magee": LR wise, i don't think anything beyond prior tweaks is expected.
this is the closed box for the result that finished last week
-<09:44:43> "stefano.schmidt": thanks @shio!
-<09:45:28> "Shio.Sakon": @Jolien i had made mistakes in the num-banks etc. for the BBH, OTHER_BBH, and IMBH sub banks
-<09:45:34> "Shio.Sakon": I'm sorry.
-<09:46:00> "Shio.Sakon": I have an offline analysis with the corrected num-banks etc. that was running, but i have been stuck since Sunday
-<09:46:10> "Shio.Sakon": we didn't have it
-<09:46:23> "chad.hanna": will there be an east call tomorrow?
-<09:46:57> "Leo Tsukada": Japan is in a week of national holidays I guess
-<09:46:58> "Shio.Sakon": @Chad I am not sure. I haven't seen an email
-<09:47:33> "Leo Tsukada": they have something like "Golden week" (GW)
-<09:47:39> "Shio.Sakon": nothing other than what i mentioned
-<09:48:46> "SurabhiSachdev": Btw I noticed for online configs we don't have different dtdphi files set for different sub banks
-<09:48:52> "patrick.godwin": yeah, that's right
-<09:50:30> "chad.hanna": hand up
-<09:52:06> "Becca Ewing":
-<09:55:32> "Leo Tsukada": I think most of the relevant codes are already in event_uploader or something?
-<09:55:37> "Shio.Sakon": no
-<09:55:38> "chad.hanna": hand up
-<09:56:23> "jolien.creighton": hand up
-<10:00:49> "jolien.creighton": you could also try simplexes in infinite time
-<10:03:10> "Andre Guimaraes": My General exam is today and I've been focusing on that, so I haven't done much more progress since last Friday, but I'll be presenting something by next Monday for sure.
-<10:22:06> "SurabhiSachdev": sorry I need to leave, I'll catch up with the minutes later.
-<10:23:12> "Rachael Huxford": hand up
-<10:23:18> "anarya": I asked bcause I have been facing this issue, for real triggers. if a trigger is found only in two detectors (say L1, V1) , I get -inf
-<10:23:51> "chad.hanna": hand up at end for the -inf stuff
-<10:24:25> "chad.hanna": hand up to rachaels question
-<10:25:07> "Becca Ewing": that would be cool
-<10:25:26> "Rachael Huxford": so it would recreate this info given like gradcedb info eg
-<10:26:04> "Rachael Huxford": I gotcha. that would be awesome
-<10:26:12> "anarya": yes thanks.. I just brought it up because I traced my issue to the time_phase_snr part of inspiral_extrinsics which is called by inpiral_lr. it would be helpful if we could follow this up offline.. I have to teach in 5 minutes
-<10:26:31> "chad.hanna": anarya, is the dt just too big in your case?
-<10:26:36> "chad.hanna": light travel time is only 30ms
-<10:27:22> "anarya": no I tested that.. I sent you an email with an small example a few days agao.
-<10:27:42> "chad.hanna": ah, okay
-<10:28:34> "chad.hanna": hand up
-<10:29:37> "anarya": @chad the problem is very simple to reproduce but its also very weird (to me) answers change depending on whther I initialize one object before the other (they are independent). if you and leo have time lets chat offline sometime? thanks..
-<10:30:25> "anarya": by everyone , gotta signoff
-<10:31:06> "chad.hanna": hand up on this
-<10:33:35> "ryan.magee": i think it does uniformly in bin and then uniformly across the bin domain right?
-<10:33:53> "ryan.magee": right
-<10:34:13> "ryan.magee": just marginally closer -- i *think* i looked at this with bankchisq and it wasn't as huge of an impact as you might expect.
-<10:47:31> "jolien.creighton": hand up
-<10:57:17> "chad.hanna": yeah
-<09:44:43> "stefano.schmidt": thanks @shio!
-<09:45:28> "Shio.Sakon": @Jolien i had made mistakes in the num-banks etc. for the BBH, OTHER_BBH, and IMBH sub banks
-<09:45:34> "Shio.Sakon": I'm sorry.
-<09:46:00> "Shio.Sakon": I have an offline analysis with the corrected num-banks etc. that was running, but i have been stuck since Sunday
-<09:46:10> "Shio.Sakon": we didn't have it
-<09:46:23> "chad.hanna": will there be an east call tomorrow?
-<09:46:57> "Leo Tsukada": Japan is in a week of national holidays I guess
-<09:46:58> "Shio.Sakon": @Chad I am not sure. I haven't seen an email
-<09:47:33> "Leo Tsukada": they have something like "Golden week" (GW)
-<09:47:39> "Shio.Sakon": nothing other than what i mentioned
-<09:48:46> "SurabhiSachdev": Btw I noticed for online configs we don't have different dtdphi files set for different sub banks
-<09:48:52> "patrick.godwin": yeah, that's right
-<09:50:30> "chad.hanna": hand up
-<09:52:06> "Becca Ewing":
-<09:55:32> "Leo Tsukada": I think most of the relevant codes are already in event_uploader or something?
-<09:55:37> "Shio.Sakon": no
-<09:55:38> "chad.hanna": hand up
-<09:56:23> "jolien.creighton": hand up
-<10:00:49> "jolien.creighton": you could also try simplexes in infinite time
-<10:03:10> "Andre Guimaraes": My General exam is today and I've been focusing on that, so I haven't done much more progress since last Friday, but I'll be presenting something by next Monday for sure.
-<10:22:06> "SurabhiSachdev": sorry I need to leave, I'll catch up with the minutes later.
-<10:23:12> "Rachael Huxford": hand up
-<10:23:18> "anarya": I asked bcause I have been facing this issue, for real triggers. if a trigger is found only in two detectors (say L1, V1) , I get -inf
-<10:23:51> "chad.hanna": hand up at end for the -inf stuff
-<10:24:25> "chad.hanna": hand up to rachaels question
-<10:25:07> "Becca Ewing": that would be cool
-<10:25:26> "Rachael Huxford": so it would recreate this info given like gradcedb info eg
-<10:26:04> "Rachael Huxford": I gotcha. that would be awesome
-<10:26:12> "anarya": yes thanks.. I just brought it up because I traced my issue to the time_phase_snr part of inspiral_extrinsics which is called by inpiral_lr. it would be helpful if we could follow this up offline.. I have to teach in 5 minutes
-<10:26:31> "chad.hanna": anarya, is the dt just too big in your case?
-<10:26:36> "chad.hanna": light travel time is only 30ms
-<10:27:22> "anarya": no I tested that.. I sent you an email with an small example a few days agao.
-<10:27:42> "chad.hanna": ah, okay
-<10:28:34> "chad.hanna": hand up
-<10:29:37> "anarya": @chad the problem is very simple to reproduce but its also very weird (to me) answers change depending on whther I initialize one object before the other (they are independent). if you and leo have time lets chat offline sometime? thanks..
-<10:30:25> "anarya": by everyone , gotta signoff
-<10:31:06> "chad.hanna": hand up on this
-<10:33:35> "ryan.magee": i think it does uniformly in bin and then uniformly across the bin domain right?
-<10:33:53> "ryan.magee": right
-<10:34:13> "ryan.magee": just marginally closer -- i *think* i looked at this with bankchisq and it wasn't as huge of an impact as you might expect.
