1. 07 Jul, 2020 1 commit
  2. 29 Jun, 2020 1 commit
  3. 24 Jun, 2020 3 commits
  4. 16 Jun, 2020 2 commits
  5. 26 May, 2020 1 commit
  6. 23 May, 2020 8 commits
  7. 22 May, 2020 2 commits
  8. 21 May, 2020 7 commits
  9. 20 May, 2020 2 commits
  10. 19 May, 2020 4 commits
  11. 12 May, 2020 1 commit
  12. 11 May, 2020 1 commit
  13. 08 May, 2020 1 commit
    • Christopher Wipf's avatar
      Fix coating brownian so it agrees with Hong · f68697f9
      Christopher Wipf authored
      The small remaining discrepancy between Hong and gwinc is due to
      an error in gwinc's implementation of the Yam et al model.
      
      The coefficient in front of the phase derivative `dcdp_z` is
      supposed to be `nN` (as written correctly in Yam et al, eq 1),
      not `nN/2` (as found in gwinc).
      
      In Hong et al, the coefficient is `nN/2`, but that's because
      their phases are defined as one-way instead of round-trip (see
      Yam et al, eq A2).
      
      After correcting the error, gwinc and Hong agree, as expected,
      for the case of equal bulk and shear losses and no
      photoelasticity.
      f68697f9
  14. 04 May, 2020 2 commits
  15. 27 Apr, 2020 4 commits