Thanks @roberto.depietri for flagging this. I think Mervyn will cover this in his update next week; as he says, we have an update from the DAC chairs that they expect GWSkyNet should meet the requirements for annotation pipelines in the RODA and (assuming we do!) I inferred this means GWSkyNet would be greenlit for making annotations public. If there's time on Wednesday's call I'd like to check in to make sure we're aligned on the path so Mervyn and I can make sure we're on the right track (and/or take some corrective action).