... | ... | @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ $ bilby_pipe_review --pp-test --prior 4s --submit |
|
|
|
|
|
## Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note, the 128s basis with the default settings was not considered of sufficient quality to pass the pp test. Here, we show that doubling the number of walks resolves the issue, a number of other tests where performed ([see the run directory](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~gregory.ashton/bilby_review/bilby0.5.4_bilby_pipe0.2.2/)) which also showed it passes if one increases the reference frequency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| prior | pp-plot | meta-data | Review status |
|
|
|
| ------ | ------- | --- | --- |
|
|
|
| 4s | ![image](uploads/1a3415fea7292e9b8ba09a7d8a395df4/image.png)| ![image](uploads/bac5b7da87ea5b5093ce7c84d25d2b2c/image.png)| |
|
... | ... | |