| ... | ... | @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ Matt Pitkin (@matthew-pitkin) & Simon Stevenson (@simon-stevenson) |
|
|
|
Further to the review above, we extend the bilby review to include
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. A full calibration review in which posterior calibration samples where compared for GW150914. This revealed minor differences between the handling of calibration between LI and Bilby which have been resolved
|
|
|
|
2. An extension of the spin limits to the maximum values possible for each prior: reruns of the PP tests demonstrate the sampler remains unbiased
|
|
|
|
2. An extension of the spin limits (from the previous 0.8 limit) to the maximum values possible for each prior: reruns of the PP tests demonstrate the sampler remains unbiased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Sign-off table
|
|
|
|
|
| ... | ... | |
