@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ Matt Pitkin (@matthew-pitkin) & Simon Stevenson (@simon-stevenson)
Further to the review above, we extend the bilby review to include
1. A full calibration review in which posterior calibration samples where compared for GW150914. This revealed minor differences between the handling of calibration between LI and Bilby which have been resolved
2. An extension of the spin limits to the maximum values possible for each prior: reruns of the PP tests demonstrate the sampler remains unbiased
2. An extension of the spin limits (from the previous 0.8 limit) to the maximum values possible for each prior: reruns of the PP tests demonstrate the sampler remains unbiased
