O3-review/evidence-review.md

@@ -25,6 +25,11 @@ The results can be seen below. The displayed errorbars are taken to be standard
 The sampling packages quote evidence uncertainties by calculating a K-L divergence. We want to test whether this quoted uncertainty is truly Gaussian, i.e. is the true evidence covered by the 1(2)-sigma interval ~68(95)% of the time, etc.
 We can display these results most conveniently by creating percentile-percentile style plots. Specifically, we look at the results of dynesty and Polychord. 
 
+![dynesty_review_unimodal_summary_pp](uploads/da9cff0a6c9d6128b7bae9afd571c3d0/dynesty_review_unimodal_summary_pp.png)
+![dynesty_review_bimodal_summary_pp](uploads/751a53cd96288a0f893e53805572937e/dynesty_review_bimodal_summary_pp.png)
+
+![pypolychord_review_unimodal_summary_pp](uploads/3ccccddbb91e3e3e0623fbb0971b00a9/pypolychord_review_unimodal_summary_pp.png)
+![pypolychord_review_bimodal_summary_pp](uploads/cebdaf5adb1d202ad53aa51e31bc1412/pypolychord_review_bimodal_summary_pp.png)
 
 ## LALInference comparison