| ... | ... | @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ We compare all results to LALInference Nest and MCMC runs using the IMRPhenomPv2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These are the top-level instructions for PE-group members running bilby on the known events and comparing the results with LALInference. If you have questions or comments, we plan to coordinate on the [bilby-devel](https://chat.ligo.org/ligo/channels/bilby-devel) channel of chat.ligo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**0. Identify the set of LALInference posterior samples** (ideally one for MCMC and one for Nest) that you'll compare against.
|
|
|
|
**0. Identify the set of LALInference posterior samples** (ideally separated results for MCMC and Nest) that you'll compare against. Tobe explicit, we do not want to use [the main pe_event_samples](https://git.ligo.org/pe_event_samples), we want to compare against the more raw per-sampler runs. This may require asking around to find who did the runs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**1. Identify a python installation** with `bilby>=0.5.4`, and `bilby_pipe>=0.2.3`. You are free to do this however you like, one easy way (on CIT) is to run the following commands:
|
|
|
|
|
| ... | ... | |
| ... | ... | |
