| ... | ... | @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ weights = np.square(bilby_posterior['mass_1']) / bilby_posterior['chirp_mass'] |
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Waveforms interface
|
|
|
|
Note: the `phi_jl` posteriors are not expected to agree as the L.I. GWTC1 results (against which bilby is compared) used the older version of the waveform interface (see https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/bilby/issues/385 for a discussion). The reviewers (Matt Pitkin and Simon Stevenson) have been involved in this discussion and have signed of: see https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/bilby/issues/392.
|
|
|
|
* The `phi_jl` posteriors are not expected to agree as the L.I. GWTC1 results (against which bilby is compared) used the older version of the waveform interface (see https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/bilby/issues/385 for a discussion). The reviewers (Matt Pitkin and Simon Stevenson) have been involved in this discussion and have signed of: see https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/bilby/issues/392.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Additionally, the `phi_1` and `phi_2` figures also show a discrepancy. In the telecon [190813](https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/bilby_pipe/wikis/O3-review/minutes/190813), Colm demonstrated this was also due to the waveforms interface by again comparing results from O3 L.I. runs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Comparison with LALInference
|
|
|
|
We compare all results to LALInference Nest and MCMC runs using the IMRPhenomPv2 analyses performed for GWTC1.
|
| ... | ... | |
| ... | ... | |