O3-review/minutes/190625.md

@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ GA:
 
 Question for group: what else?
 MP: 
-* Action: Running on analytic likelihoods.  15D uni-modal and bi-modal Gaussian distribution.  (https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/lalsuite/blob/master/lalinference/src/LALInferenceAnalyticLikelihood.c for all the covariance matrices)
-* Action: direct check of waveforms.  i.e., give LALInference and Bilby fixed parameters, and ensure waveforms are identical.
+* **Action**: Running on analytic likelihoods.  15D uni-modal and bi-modal Gaussian distribution.  (https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/lalsuite/blob/master/lalinference/src/LALInferenceAnalyticLikelihood.c for all the covariance matrices)
+* **Action**: direct check of waveforms.  i.e., give LALInference and Bilby fixed parameters, and ensure waveforms are identical.
 * Currently no tests listed about checking calibration interpolation between the two codes
 PL: should we test calibration against LI, or some other way?
 
@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ CH: Show recovery of prior.  Put in a level of miscalibration, and see if that c
 GA: Event runs we’ve been doing all include calibration — is that sufficient?
 
 CH: That should be sufficient, as long as spline nodes are defined at same frequency points.
-Action - check node splines, make calibration plot comparisons
+
+**Action** - check node splines, make calibration plot comparisons
 
 VR: Don’t want to check dynesty itself.  Just the scripts that call dynesty with default settings.  Part of the review will therefore include the configuration files
 
@@ -87,7 +88,7 @@ VR: gwcelery is out of scope for this review. But we would be remiss not to incl
 
 All: General agreement that this is a good idea.
 
-*Action*: set up gracedb playground event.
+**Action**: set up gracedb playground event.
 
 SS: Does this include post-processing?  e.g., ensuring everything is labelled correctly, etc.
 
@@ -97,7 +98,7 @@ MP: Yes, this is what’s been done with LI.  If the tests that are run with Bil
 
 GA: this is already being done for the fiducial runs, but not the known events — we can do this.
 
-*Action:* we can do this.
+**Action:** we can do this.
 
 CH: It is in the scope of this review to review the ROQ likelihood function, just not the basis.