Skip to content

Changes

Page history
Update relative binning authored by Colm Talbot's avatar Colm Talbot
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
O4-review/relative-binning.md
View page @ 167fccd8
...@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ It is very close to 1. ...@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ It is very close to 1.
![image](uploads/b3dc0d4f87076ec6c34844adc6f645b5/image.png) ![image](uploads/b3dc0d4f87076ec6c34844adc6f645b5/image.png)
By accident, we performed some runs with fiducial parameters that are a very bad fit to the actual signal. By accident, we performed some runs with fiducial parameters that are a very bad fit to the actual signal (the mass and spin for one of the NSBH simulations was used instead of the neutron star masses).
In this case, we found that the rejection sampling efficiency was very small with large mismatches. In this case, we found that the rejection sampling efficiency was very small with large mismatches.
The corresponding analysis can be found at `/home/sylvia.biscoveanu/bilby_pipe/runs/review_test/O4/fiducial_bns_PhenomTidal_take2/outdir_dynesty_relbin_medSpin_precessing_cal`. The corresponding analysis can be found at `/home/sylvia.biscoveanu/bilby_pipe/runs/review_test/O4/fiducial_bns_PhenomTidal_take2/outdir_dynesty_relbin_medSpin_precessing_cal`.
... ...
......