As part of the `Bilby` CI unit testing, we verify that the binned likelihood agrees with the regular likelihood as the reference point for a range of cases.
...
...
@@ -52,7 +57,7 @@ The fiducial BNS injection has been analyzed with the relative binning likelihoo
In all cases where a suitable starting point was provided, we see good agreement with the ROQ-likelihood runs and good resampling efficiency.
Here is the distribution of likelihood mismatches for two identical analyses of the fiducial BNS signal with a processing spin prior with magnitudes up to 0.4 and tidal deformability up to 5000.
Here is the distribution of likelihood mismatches for [two identical analyses of the fiducial BNS signal](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~colm.talbot/O4/setup_configurations/outdir_dynesty_relbin_medSpin_precessing_cal/) with a processing spin prior with magnitudes up to 0.4 and tidal deformability up to 5000.
The legend entries show the fraction of samples surviving rejection sampling.
It is very close to 1.
...
...
@@ -60,6 +65,7 @@ It is very close to 1.
By accident, we performed some runs with fiducial parameters that are a very bad fit to the actual signal.
In this case, we found that the rejection sampling efficiency was very small with large mismatches.
The corresponding analysis can be found at `/home/sylvia.biscoveanu/bilby_pipe/runs/review_test/O4/fiducial_bns_PhenomTidal_take2/outdir_dynesty_relbin_medSpin_precessing_cal`.