O4-review/relative-binning.md

@@ -2,9 +2,6 @@
 
 Compute likelihood difference for
 
-- Good BNS analysis
-- Bad BNS analysis
-
 ## [Unit testing](https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/bilby/-/blob/master/test/gw/likelihood/relative_binning_test.py)
 
 As part of the `Bilby` CI unit testing, we verify that the binned likelihood agrees with the regular likelihood as the reference point for a range of cases.
@@ -39,4 +36,12 @@ We note that while for many of the blue traces, the differences are comparativel
 
 For some successful cases, the mean ln likelihood is > 0.1 in the tails, however, this can easily be corrected using likelihood reweighting.
 
-![image](uploads/9f2075efcca8e13f0d7b3ba7e2831bfc/image.png)
\ No newline at end of file
+![image](uploads/9f2075efcca8e13f0d7b3ba7e2831bfc/image.png)
+
+### BNS analyses
+
+The fiducial BNS injection has been analyzed with the relative binning likelihood.
+
+In all cases, we see good agreement with the ROQ-likelihood runs and good resampling efficiency.
+
+*TODO*: add figures and numbers here
\ No newline at end of file