PESummary-Review.md

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ parameter conversions and the correct NR fits,  in agreement with `cbcBayesProc`
 The metafile in which PESummary stores the processed data, does not alter the input data [3]. Where downsampling applies, this does not introduce any difference in the probability densities recover.
 We have also noticed that the metafile is correctly downloadable from the web and can be handled by any of the most common packages (pandas, numpy, etc.) [4].
 
-Finally we have gone trough the documentation, tested it 5]
+Finally we have gone trough the documentation, tested it [5]
 and amended changes where needed [PUT MR request here]
 
 The review thick box and details can be found at
@@ -58,9 +58,13 @@ We stress again, that at the current status PESummary is now reviewed and we con
 
Thank you to everyone involved!
 
 [1] https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/pesummary/-/wikis/SummaryReview-script
+
 [2] https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/pesummary/-/wikis/ligo-skymap
+
 [3] https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/pesummary/-/wikis/PESummary-metafile 
+
 [4] https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/pesummary/-/wikis/Downloadable-files 
+
 [5] https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/pesummary/-/wikis/Documentation 
 # Notes