SummaryReview-script.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Can be seen here.
 #### Step 1 (Run)
 We run `pesummary` and `cbcBayesPostProc` on the posterior file `.hdf5` indicated at [PESummary-Review#Notes](https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/pesummary/-/wikis/PESummary-Review#notes)
 
-```
+```bash
 summaryreview -w /home/nicola.delillo/public_html/pesummary-review/summaryreview -s /home/nicola.delillo/pesummary-review/samples/PROD0_posterior_samples.hdf5
 ```
 Where `-w` indicates the output directory.
@@ -23,11 +23,19 @@ The `.hdf5` file was produced with a different version of lalsimulation. This re
 The webpage produced for the comparison can be seen at: [https://ligo.gravity.cf.ac.uk/~nicola.delillo/pesummary-review/summaryreview/home.html](https://ligo.gravity.cf.ac.uk/~nicola.delillo/pesummary-review/summaryreview/home.html)
 
 Our current version of lalsimulation gives:
-```
+```bash
 $ lalsim.GetApproximantFromString('IMRPhenomPv2_NRtidal')
 79
 ```
 
+We edit the file running
+
+```bash
+f = h5py.File('PROD0_posterior_samples.hdf5', 'a')
+f['lalinference/lalinference_nest/posterior_samples'].attrs['LAL_APPROXIMANT'] = 79
+f.close()
+```
+
 ## To do list
 * [ ] check 90% credible intervals
 * [ ] bayes factors