Update O4 Code Review authored by Mick Wright's avatar Mick Wright
...@@ -95,6 +95,18 @@ After some bugs were identified, a rerun of the millilensing run has yielded the ...@@ -95,6 +95,18 @@ After some bugs were identified, a rerun of the millilensing run has yielded the
- [Signal 1 Phase](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/\~mick.wright/gravelamps-o4-review/milli-discrete-phase-1.png) - [Signal 1 Phase](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/\~mick.wright/gravelamps-o4-review/milli-discrete-phase-1.png)
- Parameters are largely as expected, signal 1 phase may bear some further investigation since it does not seem to yield confident constraint. - Parameters are largely as expected, signal 1 phase may bear some further investigation since it does not seem to yield confident constraint.
#### Millilensing New Testing Set
After additional bugs were squashed, it was identified that the testing set may be simply insufficiently strong to allow detection. A more "obvious" test has been run below yieleding the following results
| Injection Model | Analysis Model | Run Directory | Corner Plot | Sign Off (Suvodip) | Sign Off (Harsh) |
| --------------- | -------------- | ------------- | ----------- | ------------------ | ---------------- |
| Milli | Milli | UWM:`/home/mick.wright/gravelamps-o4-review/new-testing-set/milli-as-milli` | [Corner](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~mick.wright/gravelamps-o4-review/new-milli-as-milli.png) | | |
| Milli | Micro | UWM:`/home/mick.wright/gravelamps-o4-review/new-testing-set/milli-as-micro` | [Corner](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~mick.wright/gravelamps-o4-review/new-milli-as-micro.png) | | |
| Milli | Unlensed | UWM:`/home/mick.wright/gravelamps-o4-review/new-testing-set/milli-as-unlensed` | [Corner](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~mick.wright/gravelamps-o4-review/new-milli-as-unlensed.png) | | |
This leads to log Bayes factors favouring the millilensing model of 362.75 over the microlensing model and 435.72 over the unlensed model, also meaning a favouring of the microlensing model of 72.97 which would again indicate the validity of using the point mass microlensing model as the initial sweep.
### Candidate O4 Sampling Review Tests ### Candidate O4 Sampling Review Tests
These runs use the configuration from the microlensing true run with the candidate sampler settings from the O4 Sampler Review. These runs use the configuration from the microlensing true run with the candidate sampler settings from the O4 Sampler Review.
... ...
......