- Parameters are largely as expected, signal 1 phase may bear some further investigation since it does not seem to yield confident constraint.
#### Millilensing New Testing Set
After additional bugs were squashed, it was identified that the testing set may be simply insufficiently strong to allow detection. A more "obvious" test has been run below yieleding the following results
| Injection Model | Analysis Model | Run Directory | Corner Plot | Sign Off (Suvodip) | Sign Off (Harsh) |
This leads to log Bayes factors favouring the millilensing model of 362.75 over the microlensing model and 435.72 over the unlensed model, also meaning a favouring of the microlensing model of 72.97 which would again indicate the validity of using the point mass microlensing model as the initial sweep.
### Candidate O4 Sampling Review Tests
These runs use the configuration from the microlensing true run with the candidate sampler settings from the O4 Sampler Review.