Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
  • Sign in
bilby
bilby
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
    • Locked Files
  • Issues 0
    • Issues 0
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
    • Iterations
  • Merge Requests 1
    • Merge Requests 1
  • Requirements
    • Requirements
    • List
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
    • Test Cases
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Package Registry
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI/CD
    • Code Review
    • Insights
    • Issue
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • NV KRISHNENDU
  • bilbybilby
  • Wiki
  • 04 Dec 2020

Last edited by Aditya Vijaykumar Dec 08, 2020
Page history

04 Dec 2020

Attendance: Aditya, Anuradha, Archisman, Krishnendu

Agenda:

  1. Plan for Bilby review of the siqm-lal pipelines

Action items

  • Krishnendu: Make the test files ready and check if they pass
  • Krishnendu: Create comparison pages for Bilby and LAL runs, choose a few O1/O2/O3 events
  • Aditya: Document the code-review-tasks page and let Krishnendu know once it is ready
  • Anuradha, Archisman: provide comments on codes and trial runs

Minutes

  • Krishnendu: Brief introduction to the review tasks
  • Aditya: Event choosing criteria needs to be revisited. There is an issue if there is a loud event with high mass and spin-magnitudes. So the inspiral SNR+ non-zero spin magnitude is a weaker criterion to choose events. One may also put a total mass cut-off. This concern arises mainly because we do the analysis for the IMR signal.
  • Anuradha: We can carry out an injection study for focussing on this kind of system.
  • Archisman: IMRCT also faced a very similar issue, where to put the frequency cut-off and so on. A detailed systematic study has been carried.
  • All four decided to postpone this for a more focused detailed discussion.
  • Archisman: The timeline for the review. Is there a plan to use this for O3b for which the preliminary results should be available by mid-Feb 2021.
  • Sayantani, Divya Jyothi are part of the O3b analyses, irrespective of the Bilby pipeline review, we will continue the LAL runs in parallel.
  • Aditya: Bilby code-review is not a lot. Hopeful to meet the O3-b timeline.
  • Dividing responsibilities for the review task
  • Aditya will create the wiki page, Anuradha and Archisman will take a look at the codes and give comments also will focus more on the results review part.
Clone repository
  • 01 Feb 2021
  • 04 Dec 2020
  • 15 Feb 2021
  • 18 Jan 2021
  • 22 Feb 2021
  • Code Review
  • Test Runs
  • Home