| ... | ... | @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ |
|
|
|
|7.|[GW190707a](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190707q)<br> person responsible: Krishnendu| Prod0 OK. | Archisman: No mtot railing. SIQM very light railing. **SIGNED OFF!** <br><br> Anuradha: BBH Comparison_All.html page does not open for me. **Please fix.** Otherwise looks good. <br><br> Archisman: sym 4 chains OK. pos 4 chains OK. | || Yes, reruns finished and results are uploaded|
|
|
|
|
|8.|[GW190708a](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190708ap)<br> person responsible:Saleem | Prod0/5 OK. |Anuradha: LogL is a bit different in BBH case. Otherwise looks good. **SIGNED OFF!**<br><br> Archisman: No mtot railing. SIQM OK. sym 4 chains OK. pos 3 chains OK. **SIGNED OFF!** | ||Yes, reruns finished and results are uploaded for all runs. Ready to be reviewed|
|
|
|
|
|9.|[GW190720a](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190720a)<br> person responsible: Krishnendu| Prod0 seems OK. Should we check with PE if L1 flow is finally 20 and not 40 Hz? <br><br> Krishnendu: fixed. [reply PE channel](https://chat.ligo.org/ligo/channels/parameter-estimation/1bypq6rnmpngtjetm8ssw17t3e) <br><br> Archisman: OK. |Anuradha: <br> why t0, cos(alpha), azimuth are different in all the 3 cases from prod run? <br> BBH: The **ACF** for tc, t0, theta_JN, cos(alpha), azimuth, delta, DL, iota look suspicious. <br> pos: The **ACF** for azimuth look suspicious. <br> The **ACF** for cos(alpha), azimuth, a1, cos(theta1) look suspicious. <br><br> Archisman: So mtot railing. SIQM OK. sym 4 chains; chain 4 may be problematic. pos only 1 chain! **SIGNED OFF** | ||Yes, reruns finished and results are uploaded|
|
|
|
|
|10.|[GW190728a](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190728q)<br> person responsible: Saleem|| Anuradha: LogL is a bit different in BBH case. Otherwise looks good. **SIGNED OFF!** |||PSD affected. Results uploaded and Ready to be reviewed|
|
|
|
|
|10.|[GW190728a](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190728q)<br> person responsible: Saleem| Prod0 OK. | Anuradha: LogL is a bit different in BBH case. Otherwise looks good. **SIGNED OFF!** <br><br> Archisman: sym mtot bimodal; no railing. SIQM only negative; pos consistent with sym. sym 2 chains; sampling non-identical regions. pos only 1 chain. **NOT OK** |||PSD affected. Results uploaded and Ready to be reviewed|
|
|
|
|
|11.|[GW190814a](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190814bv) <br> person responsible: Krishnendu| Archisman: base config file info not available. <br><br> <br> Krishnendu: fixed. |Anuradha: Why t0, azimuth and cos(alpha) are different from Prod run in all the 3 cases? In 'result summary' ks_pos has the link of ks_sym, **please fix.** <br><br> Krishnendu: fixed. <br><br> Anuradha: In pos run, **ACF** for all the spin parameters, all the mass parameters, alpha, delta, tc, iota, azimuth look suspicious. | ||Yes, reruns finished and results are uploaded|
|
|
|
|
|12.|[GW190828a](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190828j) <br> person responsible: Saleem||Anuradha: LogL is a bit different in BBH case. Which might be okay. **ACFs** for time, iota, ra, dec, and theta_JN are suspicious in the 3 runs.|||Yes, Reruns finished and results Ready to be reviewed|
|
|
|
|
|13.|[GW190828b](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190828l) <br> person responsible: Saleem|| Anuradha:<br>BBH: Awaiting results. <br> pos/sym: **ACF** for time, ra, dec, DL are suspicious.|||Yes, Reruns finished for ks_pos and ks_sym whose results are ready to be reviewed. BBH runs failed and reruns started (14/7/2020)|
|
| ... | ... | |
