| ... | ... | @@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ Main results review page: https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3 |
|
|
|
**Details of O1/O2 events**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|No.| NAME | Comments on config ini file|Comments on results | Reviewees comments |
|
|
|
|
|---| ---- | ---- | ---- | --- |
|
|
|
|
|No.| NAME | Comments on config ini file|Comments on results | Reviewees comments |Details of the rerun|
|
|
|
|
|---| ---- | ---- | ---- | --- |--- |
|
|
|
|
|1. |[GW150914](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/GW150914) | |<br>Anuradha: No comparison-with-prod-run-plots, no ks plots.<br> ks_pos/ks_sym: Why is log L different? why a1 and a2 are oppositely unconstrained? Why is optimal (or matched-filter) SNR so different than BBH case?|<br>Krishnendu: Comparison pages added now|No rerun|
|
|
|
|
|2. |[GW151226](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/GW151226) | |<br>Anuradha: No comparison-with-prod-run-plots, no ks plots.<br> ks_pos/ks_sym: Why is log L very very different? why a1 and a2 are totally unconstrained? Why is optimal (or matched-filter) SNR so different than BBH case? Mc, Mtot and m1 are railing at the boundary. <br> <br> Archisman: spin angles are different (generic feature); mtot railing. |<br>Krishnendu: Comparison pages added now|Rerun|
|
|
|
|
|3. |[GW170104](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/GW170104) | |<br>Anuradha: No comparison-with-prod-run-plots, no ks plots. <br> ks_pos: Why is log L different? Why a1 and a2 are totally unconstrained? <br> ks_sym: DL and q go beyond prior limits. Why Mc is so different? <br> <br> Archisman: does distance hit the upper bound or is that just the shape of the posterior? |<br>Krishnendu: Comparison pages added now|Rerun|
|
| ... | ... | |
