O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/o3a-review-report.md

@@ -22,8 +22,7 @@ Main results review page: https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3
 |No.| NAME | Comments on config ini file|Comments on results  | Reviewees comments |Details of the rerun|
 |---| ---- | ---- |  ---- | --- |--- |
 |1. |[GW150914](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/GW150914) | |<br>Anuradha: No comparison-with-prod-run-plots, no ks plots.<br> ks_pos/ks_sym: Why is log L different? why a1 and a2 are oppositely unconstrained? Why is optimal (or matched-filter) SNR so different than BBH case? <br> Anuradha: <br> BBH: Why are ra, dec, DL, MF-SNR, OP-SNR are different? Is comparison with L1 samples? <br> ks_pos/ks_sym:  Why are ra, dec, DL differnt? ks plots missing.|<br>Krishnendu: Comparison pages added now| Rerun|
-|2. |[GW151226](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/GW151226) | |<br>Anuradha: No comparison-with-prod-run-plots, no ks plots.<br> ks_pos/ks_sym: Why is log L very very different? why a1 and a2 are totally unconstrained? Why is optimal (or matched-filter) SNR so different than BBH case? Mc, Mtot and m1 are railing at the boundary. <br> <br> Archisman: spin angles are different (generic feature); mtot railing. |<br>Krishnendu: Comparison pages added now <br><br> Krishnendu (on the other comments): <br> [compare mtotal_source and mtotal_detector](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/O3/o3_a_tgr/O1_O2/GW151226_G211117/pv2_c01_prod/comp_PE_Prod0_cbcBayesCompPos/bh_bh/) <br> [config](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/O3/o3_a_tgr/O1_O2/GW151226_G211117/config/GW151226_C02_IMRPv2_bh.ini) <br> mtotal should not just bounded bcz of the mass prior ```distance-max=1500
-chirpmass-min=9.5 chirpmass-max=10.5 q-min=0.0555555555555556 q-max=1.0 comp-max=54.398 comp-min=3.022 ```` |Rerun|
+|2. |[GW151226](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/GW151226) | |<br>Anuradha: No comparison-with-prod-run-plots, no ks plots.<br> ks_pos/ks_sym: Why is log L very very different? why a1 and a2 are totally unconstrained? Why is optimal (or matched-filter) SNR so different than BBH case? Mc, Mtot and m1 are railing at the boundary. <br> <br> Archisman: spin angles are different (generic feature); mtot railing. |<br>Krishnendu: Comparison pages added now <br><br> Krishnendu (on the other comments): <br> [compare mtotal_source and mtotal_detector](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/O3/o3_a_tgr/O1_O2/GW151226_G211117/pv2_c01_prod/comp_PE_Prod0_cbcBayesCompPos/bh_bh/) <br> [config](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/O3/o3_a_tgr/O1_O2/GW151226_G211117/config/GW151226_C02_IMRPv2_bh.ini) <br> mtotal should not just bounded bcz of the mass prior ```distance-max=1500 chirpmass-min=9.5 chirpmass-max=10.5 q-min=0.0555555555555556 q-max=1.0 comp-max=54.398 comp-min=3.022 ```` |Rerun|
 |3. |[GW170104](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/GW170104) | |<br>Anuradha: No comparison-with-prod-run-plots, no ks plots. <br> ks_pos: Why is log L different? Why a1 and a2 are totally unconstrained? <br> ks_sym: DL and q go beyond prior limits. Why Mc is so different? <br> <br> Archisman: does distance hit the upper bound or is that just the shape of the posterior? |<br>Krishnendu: Comparison pages added now|Rerun|
 |4. |[GW170608](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/GW170608) | |<br> Anuradha: <br> BBH: Why log L is different? <br>ks_pos: Why log L is different? a2 is unconstrained. m1, m2 and mtotal are railing at the boundary. 1D ks plot is missing on the posplots.html page. <br>ks_sym: Why log L is different? a2 is unconstrained. m1, m2 and mtotal are railing at the boundary. 1D ks plot is missing on the posplots.html page. <br> <br> Archisman: spin angles are different (generic); mtot severely railing. ||Rerun|
 |5. |[GW170814](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/GW170814) | |<br>Anuradha: No comparison-with-prod-run-plots, no ks plots.<br> ks_pos/ks_sym: Why a1 and a2 are totally unconstrained? <br> <br> Archisman: spin angles are different (generic); mtot is fine. Why is dL so different? Why are sky angles not estimated in the SIQM run? Was a 2 detector run launched by mistake? <br> Anuradha: same question about DL and sky angles. Ks plots missing. |<br>Krishnendu: Comparison pages added now|No rerun|