| ... | ... | @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ |
|
|
|
|4. |[GW170608](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/GW170608)<br> person responsible: Saleem | |<br> Anuradha: <br> BBH: Why log L is different? <br>ks_pos: Why log L is different? a2 is unconstrained. m1, m2, and mtotal are railing at the boundary. 1D ks plot is missing on the posplots.html page. <br>ks_sym: Why log L is different? a2 is unconstrained. m1, m2 and mtotal are railing at the boundary. 1D ks plot is missing on the posplots.html page. <br> <br> Archisman: spin angles are different (generic); mtot severely railing. <br><br> Anuradha: Please confirm the Bayes factor for BBH and Prod runs. Please let me know the lowest mtot allowed in the runs. <br><br> Anuradha: **SIGNED OFF!**| Saleem: There is no Mtot prior imposed in the config and there is no railing too (it appears to have so due to the small number of bins). The same applies for m1 and m2 railing as well. The priors on m1 and m2 are [1, 40] and the so-called railing is way too inside this limits. So, a rerun may not be required. <br> <br> Compared to the PE ini, the mc prior is wider for siqm: [8,9] vs [5,20], with the latter being the same as that used for TIGER. For the given mass ratio prior, this allows wider range of mtot to be sampled. <br> <br> The 1D pdf is available in the pesummary page which is linked from the event page. <br><br> logBF for [PE run](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~eve.chase/monitor/online_pe/C02_clean/C02_HL_Pv2/lalinferencenest/IMRPhenomPv2pseudoFourPN/1180922494.49-0/H1L1/posplots.html) is 91.98 and for [SIQM BBH run](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~muhammed.saleem/SIQM-events/GW170608/bbh_imr_pv2_run2/1180922494.4922-0/H1L1/pesummary/home.html) is 89.13 <br><br> As per the prior settings in the config.ini, the longest signal is for mtotal = 11.4 Msun (corresponding to mc-min = 5 and q=1) which has a duration 15.4s (as computed using lalapps_chirplen). The seglen used for the run is 16. |Results ready for review|
|
|
|
|
|5. |[GW170814](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/GW170814)<br> person responsible: Krishnendu | |<br>Anuradha: No comparison-with-prod-run-plots, no ks plots.<br> ks_pos/ks_sym: Why a1 and a2 are totally unconstrained? <br> <br> Archisman: spin angles are different (generic); mtot is fine. Why is dL so different? Why are sky angles not estimated in the SIQM run? Was a 2 detector run launched by mistake? <br> Anuradha: same question about DL and sky angles. Ks plots missing. <br><br> Anuradha: Please confirm the Bayes factor for BBH case. Why Phi_JL are different in all 3 comparison? <br><br> Anuradha: The difference in Log L and phi_JL is attributed to changes listed below in two pipelines. **SIGNED OFF!**|<br>Krishnendu: Comparison pages added now <br> <br> BFs [BH runs with SIQM](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/O3/o3_a_tgr/O1_O2/GW170814_G297595/pv2_c01_prod/bh/home.html) is 126.44 and for the [Prod0 run](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~jacob.lange/LALInference/O2_PE/C02-cleaned-final/G297595-C02-cleaned-H1L1V1-IMRPv2-rererun/lalinferencenest/IMRPhenomPv2pseudoFourPN/1186741861.53-0/V1H1L1/posplots.html) is 125.411 |Results ready for review|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The differences between GWTC-1 and the current BH results can be understood in terms of the LALInference distance bugfix and the waveform spin convention changes elaborated [here](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/GWTC1-O3a-differences).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Table 3: Main scripts used for post-processing
|
|
|
|
|
| ... | ... | |
