Skip to content

Changes

Page history
Update o3a review report authored by NV Krishnendu's avatar NV Krishnendu
Show whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/o3a-review-report.md
View page @ a9fbfa49
...@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ ...@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
### Table 1: List of events from O3a ### Table 1: List of events from O3a
|No.| NAME | Comments on config ini file|Comments on results from the reviewer | Reviewees comments |Final status|PSD issue affected or not| |No.| NAME | Comments on config ini file|Comments on results from the reviewer | Reviewees comments |Final status|PSD issue affected or not|
|---| ---- | ---- | ---- | --- |--- | |---| ---- | ---- | ---- | --- |--- |----|
|1. |[GW190408a](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190408a)<br> person responsible: Krishnendu| |<br> Anuradha:<br>BBH run: In think there is a typo in labeling, it should be BBH not ks_pos.<br> ks_pos/ks_sym: The logL is different. S1z and S2z are broader than BBH run, and hence effective spin is broader than BBH run. Mtotal and Mc are shifted towards lower values. <br> <br> Archisman: looks fine. **SIGNED OFF!** <br> Anuradha: **SIGNED OFF!**|<br> Difference in SNR and logL are expected. [Discussion on matter-]most(https://chat.ligo.org/ligo/pl/n1rhn8sdt7g89muqe45iumdixa) <br> In order to make sure that the logL difference not affected our analsyis we can check the BFs and compare the one from PE Prod run and the one obtained from our BBH run. <br> In this case, log(BF)-PE PROD is 94.99 and SIQM-BH run is 95.2, hence no issues.| **SIGNED OFF!** |<br> Yes, reruns are adviced because of the difference in the estimated PSD for the three runs| |1. |[GW190408a](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190408a)<br> person responsible: Krishnendu| |<br> Anuradha:<br>BBH run: In think there is a typo in labeling, it should be BBH not ks_pos.<br> ks_pos/ks_sym: The logL is different. S1z and S2z are broader than BBH run, and hence effective spin is broader than BBH run. Mtotal and Mc are shifted towards lower values. <br> <br> Archisman: looks fine. **SIGNED OFF!** <br> Anuradha: **SIGNED OFF!**|<br> Difference in SNR and logL are expected. [Discussion on matter-]most(https://chat.ligo.org/ligo/pl/n1rhn8sdt7g89muqe45iumdixa) <br> In order to make sure that the logL difference not affected our analsyis we can check the BFs and compare the one from PE Prod run and the one obtained from our BBH run. <br> In this case, log(BF)-PE PROD is 94.99 and SIQM-BH run is 95.2, hence no issues.| **SIGNED OFF!** |<br> Yes, reruns are adviced because of the difference in the estimated PSD for the three runs|
|2. |[GW190412m](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190412m)<br> person responsible: Krishnendu||<br> Anuradha: <br> BBH run: Why log L is so different?<br>ks_pos: Why log L is so different? cos(alpha) is very different. chi_eff, q and Mc have shifted towards lower values. Mtotal and m1 are railing at the lower side. <br>ks_sym: Why log L is so different? Mtotal and m1 are railing at the lower side. q has shifted to higher values. <br> <br> Archisman: needs rerun with wider mtot prior. <br> <br> Archisman (on reruns): cosalpha for pos? Looks good otherwise. <br><br>Anuradha (on rerun) :<br>BBH:Please confirm the Bayes factor values. Why t0, azimuth and cos(alpha) are different?<br>ks_sym: Why t0 and cos(alpha) are different?|<br> Krishnendu: <br> On the rerun comments <br> log(BF) from [PE Prod](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~daniel.williams/LVC/projects/O3/C01/S190412m/Prod0/home.html) run 138.28 and from the [SIQM BH run](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/O3/o3_a_tgr/S190412m/pv2_c01_prod/comp_PE_Prod0_mtotalwiderprior/bh_bh/home.html) is again 138.28 |Reruns are over. Waiting for comments from reviewers|<br> Yes, reruns are adviced because of the difference in the estimated PSD for the three runs| |2. |[GW190412m](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190412m)<br> person responsible: Krishnendu||<br> Anuradha: <br> BBH run: Why log L is so different?<br>ks_pos: Why log L is so different? cos(alpha) is very different. chi_eff, q and Mc have shifted towards lower values. Mtotal and m1 are railing at the lower side. <br>ks_sym: Why log L is so different? Mtotal and m1 are railing at the lower side. q has shifted to higher values. <br> <br> Archisman: needs rerun with wider mtot prior. <br> <br> Archisman (on reruns): cosalpha for pos? Looks good otherwise. <br><br>Anuradha (on rerun) :<br>BBH:Please confirm the Bayes factor values. Why t0, azimuth and cos(alpha) are different?<br>ks_sym: Why t0 and cos(alpha) are different?|<br> Krishnendu: <br> On the rerun comments <br> log(BF) from [PE Prod](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~daniel.williams/LVC/projects/O3/C01/S190412m/Prod0/home.html) run 138.28 and from the [SIQM BH run](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/O3/o3_a_tgr/S190412m/pv2_c01_prod/comp_PE_Prod0_mtotalwiderprior/bh_bh/home.html) is again 138.28 |Reruns are over. Waiting for comments from reviewers|<br> Yes, reruns are adviced because of the difference in the estimated PSD for the three runs|
|3. |[GW190425z](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190425z)<br> person responsible: Krishnendu|| Archisman: still running. **Please link intermediate postprocessing pages!** ||<br> Not affected by the PSD difference| |3. |[GW190425z](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190425z)<br> person responsible: Krishnendu|| Archisman: still running. **Please link intermediate postprocessing pages!** ||<br> Not affected by the PSD difference|
......