O3b-analysis/Action-Items.md

-[[_TOC_]]
+* **Action items for data release, figures, macros and tables in the paper:**
+  * For creating data release repo:
+    * We need <span dir="">/home/tgr.o3/o3b-tgr/results/sim/o1o2o3a</span> and <span dir="">/home/tgr.o3/o3b-tgr/results/sim/o</span>3b
+    * Get events for <span dir="">/home/tgr.o3/o3b-tgr/results/sim/o1o2o3a</span> by running <https://git.ligo.org/muhammed.saleem/o3siqm-updates/-/blob/master/script/clone_repo.py>, this script has to be updated commenting out the events that don't pass the selection criteria. See, <https://git.ligo.org/muhammed.saleem/o3siqm-updates/-/blob/master/o3b/scripts/simplot.ipynb> for these events
+  * Now we need: /home/tgr.o3/o3b-tgr/release/sim
+    * Pull data script: <https://git.ligo.org/muhammed.saleem/o3siqm-updates/-/blob/master/o3b/scripts/hier_analysis/pull_data_updated_knv.ipynb>
+    * This script will be at:  /home/tgr.o3/o3b-tgr/release/sim
+    * That means we have all the .dat.dz files created here like [O3a](https://git.ligo.org/publications/O3/o3a-cbc-tgr/-/tree/master/release/sim)
+    * We have to update [simplot](https://git.ligo.org/muhammed.saleem/o3siqm-updates/-/blob/master/o3b/scripts/simplot.ipynb) script including all the macros following [o3a](https://git.ligo.org/publications/O3/o3a-cbc-tgr/-/blob/master/release/sim/sim_plot.ipynb)
+* [Listing down the main action items for the O3b TGR analysis](#listing-down-the-main-action-items-for-the-o3b-tgr-analysis)
+  * [Comments from results so far (26 July 2021)](#comments-from-results-so-far-26-july-2021)
+  * [Results review readiness](#results-review-readiness)
+    * [Results review:](#results-review)
+  * [Numbers into the paper section:](#numbers-into-the-paper-section)
+  * [Plotting script](#plotting-script)
+  * [Event list](#event-list)
+  * [Review](#review)
+  * [PE](#pe)
 
 # Listing down the main action items for the O3b TGR analysis
 
 ## Comments from results so far (26 July 2021)
 
 - S200316bj:
-  - LAPLACE, https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~sayantani.datta/LSC/lalinference/O3/o3_b_tgr/sim/SummaryPages/S200316bj/Prod2/LAPLACE/laplace_bbh.txt, not passed?
+  - LAPLACE, <https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/\~sayantani.datta/LSC/lalinference/O3/o3_b_tgr/sim/SummaryPages/S200316bj/Prod2/LAPLACE/laplace_bbh.txt>, not passed?
   - Extra features in mass posteriors for both SIQM and BBH runs
   - Does the Mc-q prior translates to a boundary at lower m1-prior? I mean the m1 prior hits the lower mass end. Probably the Mc prior has to be widened
   - I think the mass features are more dominant for BBH runs.
@@ -13,12 +30,9 @@
 - S191216ap:
   - dKs, long-tail on the positive side? could be a sampling issue?
   - Mass parameters prior have to be checked here too. See total-masses for instance, are they hitting the boundary or is it just a sharp end of posterior
-   
 - S200225q
-  - For S200225q (this is the event with final results available)
-Railing against mass prior? I think this is a common issue for all events
-  - Mc bimodal for PE Prod but not for dKs run, see here
-Compare to other events, there is more difference b/w BBH and dKs runs (masses, spins, distance)
+  - For S200225q (this is the event with final results available) Railing against mass prior? I think this is a common issue for all events
+  - Mc bimodal for PE Prod but not for dKs run, see here Compare to other events, there is more difference b/w BBH and dKs runs (masses, spins, distance)
   - dKs looks fine
 - S191204r
   - Mc-q prior transformation to m1-m2 has to be checked. (like all other events LAPLACE complaints about mtotal railing)
@@ -28,42 +42,45 @@ Compare to other events, there is more difference b/w BBH and dKs runs (masses,
   - Only event with mass prior issues not shown?
 
 ## Results review readiness
+
 ### Results review:
 
 1. The config file review readiness requires the following:
    1. Link config files of each event from the event wiki page
    2. Link LOGIC output for each case: BBH-PE_config comparison and SIQM-PE_config comparison
    3. Each event table should have one or more columns for the reviewer's comments on the config files.
-
 2. The results review readiness requires the following:
    1. BBH and SIQM posteriors (make cbcBayesPostProc and SummaryPages). SummaryPages should have config, PSD, Calibration files, etc. The 'label' used should be the same for all the events.
    2. Create BBH-PE_Run and SIQM-PE_Run comparison pages. Use SummaryPages or cbcBayesCompPos for this.
    3. Update the [summary_table](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3b-analysis#summary-table)
    4. Each event table should have one or more columns for the reviewer's comments on the posteriors.
 
-
-
 ## Numbers into the paper section:
 
-- [ ] Bayes factors
-- [ ] Combined Bayes factors
-- [ ] Combined bounds from restricted as well as HIR analysis
-- [ ] Inclusion of a table with Q_GR and so on?
+* [ ] Bayes factors
+* [ ] Combined Bayes factors
+* [ ] Combined bounds from restricted as well as HIR analysis
+* [ ] Inclusion of a table with Q_GR and so on?
 
 ## Plotting script
-- [ ] HIR analysis
-- [ ] Which waveform to use for 190412 and 200115 (only two events with HMs?) for combined results?
+
+* [ ] HIR analysis
+* [ ] Which waveform to use for 190412 and 200115 (only two events with HMs?) for combined results?
+
 ## Event list
-- [ ] Cross check again once the final PE results are available and try to avoid any bugs on event selection
-- [ ] Make sure that no events left
+
+* [ ] Cross check again once the final PE results are available and try to avoid any bugs on event selection
+* [ ] Make sure that no events left
+
 ## Review
-- [ ] Event selection script, LAPLACE and LOGIC scripts
-- [ ] Config files (along with the diff/LOGIC results)
-- [ ] Available PE results
-- [ ] Other plotting scripts
+
+* [ ] Event selection script, LAPLACE and LOGIC scripts
+* [ ] Config files (along with the diff/LOGIC results)
+* [ ] Available PE results
+* [ ] Other plotting scripts
 
 ## PE
-- [ ] Keep an eye on final PE status
-- [ ] Status update on NSBH MCMC runs
-- [ ] Start Bilby runs using Pv2 and compare results with LAL for Bilby review 
 
+* [ ] Keep an eye on final PE status
+* [ ] Status update on NSBH MCMC runs
+* [ ] Start Bilby runs using Pv2 and compare results with LAL for Bilby review
\ No newline at end of file