Update Action Items authored by NV Krishnendu's avatar NV Krishnendu
...@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ ...@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
- Does the Mc-q prior translates to a boundary at lower m1-prior? I mean the m1 prior hits the lower mass end. Probably the Mc prior has to be widened - Does the Mc-q prior translates to a boundary at lower m1-prior? I mean the m1 prior hits the lower mass end. Probably the Mc prior has to be widened
- I think the mass features are more dominant for BBH runs. - I think the mass features are more dominant for BBH runs.
- dKs look fine. - dKs look fine.
- S191216ap: - S191216ap:
- dKs, long-tail on the positive side? could be a sampling issue? - dKs, long-tail on the positive side? could be a sampling issue?
- Mass parameters prior have to be checked here too. See total-masses for instance, are they hitting the boundary or is it just a sharp end of posterior - Mass parameters prior have to be checked here too. See total-masses for instance, are they hitting the boundary or is it just a sharp end of posterior
... ...
......