We perform an injection study to see the effect of the upper cut-off frequency of the analysis. Fixed M=15Msun with q=2 and fixed spins of (0.6, 0.3). Considered spin-dependent upper cut-off, inspiral only cut-off of the IMRPhenom waveforms and the full IMR cut-off frequency.
We perform an injection study to see the effect of the upper cut-off frequency of the analysis. Fixed M=15Msun with q=2 and fixed spins of (0.6, 0.3). Considered spin-dependent upper cut-off, inspiral only cut-off of the IMRPhenom waveforms and the full IMR cut-off frequency.
...
@@ -46,6 +47,9 @@ We perform an injection study to see the effect of the upper cut-off frequency o
...
@@ -46,6 +47,9 @@ We perform an injection study to see the effect of the upper cut-off frequency o
* Increasing cutoff increases the matched-filter SNR of recovered signal [SNR comparison](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-la.caltech.edu/~abhirup.ghosh/kappa_review/snr_cutoff/combinedsummarypages/html/Comparison_matched_filter_snr.html). Appropriately, [posteriors on dquadmons](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-la.caltech.edu/~abhirup.ghosh/kappa_review/snr_cutoff/combinedsummarypages/html/Comparison_dquadmons.html) get more constrained as one would intuitively expect.
## Effect of spin magnitude
## Effect of spin magnitude
We perform an injection study to see the effect of the upper cut-off frequency of the analysis. Fixed M=15Msun with q=2 and fixed spins of (0.9, 0.8), (0.6, 0.3), (0.4, 0.3) and (0.2, 0.1). Truncated the analysis at the inspiral transition frequency and the value is 244Hz
We perform an injection study to see the effect of the upper cut-off frequency of the analysis. Fixed M=15Msun with q=2 and fixed spins of (0.9, 0.8), (0.6, 0.3), (0.4, 0.3) and (0.2, 0.1). Truncated the analysis at the inspiral transition frequency and the value is 244Hz