Results-review.md

@@ -48,8 +48,12 @@ We perform an injection study to see the effect of the upper cut-off frequency o
 |full IMR | [Link](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-la.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/Aligned_test_runs/method_paper_runs/Trial/m1_10_m2_5_p6p3_400Mpc_fimr/uu/lalinferencenest/IMRPhenomPv2threePointFivePN/900000000-0/V1H1L1/posplots.html)  | | |
 
 **Comments:**
-* Increasing cutoff increases the matched-filter SNR of recovered signal [(SNR comparison)](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-la.caltech.edu/~abhirup.ghosh/kappa_review/snr_cutoff/combinedsummarypages/html/Comparison_matched_filter_snr.html). Appropriately, [posteriors on dquadmons](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-la.caltech.edu/~abhirup.ghosh/kappa_review/snr_cutoff/combinedsummarypages/html/Comparison_dquadmons.html) get more constrained as one would intuitively expect.
-* What are the possible systematic biases you might get from not extending the parameterisation to the merger-ringdown region?
+* Increasing cutoff increases the matched-filter SNR of the recovered signal [(SNR comparison)](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-la.caltech.edu/~abhirup.ghosh/kappa_review/snr_cutoff/combinedsummarypages/html/Comparison_matched_filter_snr.html). Appropriately, [posteriors on dquadmons](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-la.caltech.edu/~abhirup.ghosh/kappa_review/snr_cutoff/combinedsummarypages/html/Comparison_dquadmons.html) get more constrained as one would intuitively expect.
+* What are the possible systematic biases you might get from not extending the parameterization to the merger-ringdown region?
+
+**Comments (Krishnendu):**
+* Yes, we agree and is consistent with what we also find. 
+* In order to understand the systematic biases arise due to the truncation we have not performed any particular test. In other words, the only effect we focussed is also the SNR effect.
 
 ## Effect of spin magnitude
 
@@ -94,7 +98,7 @@ The analysis is performed for systems with a fixed spin magnitude of (0.4, 0.3).
 |20+10|122|[Link](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/inj_rev/run_dir/20_10_uu/p4p3/)||
 |25+5|122|[Link](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/inj_rev/run_dir/25_5_uu/p4p3/)||
 
-**Comments**: For equal mass binaries, systems with both spins anti-aligned wrt the orbital angular momentum, are better for constraining the parameter space of \delta\kappa_s < 0, while systems with both spins aligned with the orbital angular moment, are better for constraining the parameter space for \delta\kappa_s > 0. For highly unequal mass binaries, the spin on the primary compact becomes significant in determining chi_eff, and depending on its orientation wrt \vec{L} determines the constraints on the parameter space.
+**Comments**: For equal mass binaries, systems with both spins anti-aligned wrt the orbital angular momentum, are better for constraining the parameter space of \delta\kappa_s < 0, while systems with both spins aligned with the orbital angular moment are better for constraining the parameter space for \delta\kappa_s > 0. For highly unequal mass binaries, the spin on the primary compact becomes significant in determining chi_eff, and depending on its orientation wrt \vec{L} determines the constraints on the parameter space.
 
 ## Effect of SNR
 
@@ -103,6 +107,9 @@ The analysis is performed for systems with a fixed spin magnitude of (0.4, 0.3).
 |(0.6, 0.3), DL=400Mpc|	[10+10](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/dist/10_10_p6p3/), [12.5+12.5](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/dist/12p5_12p5_p6p3/), [14+7](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/dist/14_7_p6p3/), [15+15](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/dist/15_15_p6p3/), [16+8](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/dist/16_8_p6p3/), [20+10](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/dist/20_10_p6p3/)| <br> <br> [comparison page (for all systems q=1 and q=2)](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/Fixed_dist/)<br>[comparison page (for q=1)](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/Fixed_dist_massratio1/)<br>[comparison page (for q=2)](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/Fixed_dist_massratio2/)|
 |(0.6, 0.3), snr=43|[7.5+7.5](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/snr/7p5_7p5_p6p3/), [10+5](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/snr/10_5_p6p3/),[10+10](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/snr/10_10_p6p3/), [12.5+12.5](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/snr/12p5_12p5_p6p3/), [14+7](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/snr/14_7_p6p3/), [15+15](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/snr/15_15_p6p3/), [16+8](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/snr/16_8_p6p3/), [20+10](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/snr/20_10_p6p3)|[comparison page (for all systems q=1 and q=2)](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/Fixed_snr/)<br>[comparison page (for q=1)](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/Fixed_snr_massratio1/)<br>[comparison page (for q=2)](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/Fixed_snr_massratio2/)|
 
+**Comments (Krishnendu):**
+* We notice that the recovered matched-filter SNR in each case is different for systems even though the injections assume a fixed SNR injection of 43. This offset is primarily due to the fact that the injections are made using full IMR frequencies and recovery is truncated at a frequency which is a function of the total mass of the system. For low mass systems, we expect this offset to be less.
+
 **Comments:**
 
 **Notice that for the runs done with a different version of the code the results are unaffected**