Skip to content

Changes

Page history
Update Results review authored by NV Krishnendu's avatar NV Krishnendu
Show whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Results-review.md
View page @ 9e161041
......@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ The analysis is performed for systems with a fixed spin magnitude of (0.4, 0.3).
|(0.6, 0.3), snr=43|[7.5+7.5](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/snr/7p5_7p5_p6p3/), [10+5](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/snr/10_5_p6p3/),[10+10](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/snr/10_10_p6p3/), [12.5+12.5](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/snr/12p5_12p5_p6p3/), [14+7](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/snr/14_7_p6p3/), [15+15](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/snr/15_15_p6p3/), [16+8](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/snr/16_8_p6p3/), [20+10](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/massplot/snr/20_10_p6p3)|[comparison page (for all systems q=1 and q=2)](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/Fixed_snr/)<br>[comparison page (for q=1)](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/Fixed_snr_massratio1/)<br>[comparison page (for q=2)](https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/MP_Runs/xml/Fixed_snr_massratio2/)|
**Comments (Krishnendu):**
* We notice that the recovered matched-filter SNR in each case is different for systems even though the injections assume a fixed SNR injection of 43. This offset is primarily due to the fact that the injections are made using full IMR frequencies and recovery is truncated at a frequency which is a function of the total mass of the system. For low mass systems, we expect this offset to be less.
* We notice that the recovered matched-filter SNR in each case is different for systems even though the injections assume a fixed SNR injection of 43. This offset is primarily due to the fact that the injections are made using full IMR frequencies and recovery is truncated at a frequency which is a function of the total mass of the system. For low mass systems, we expect this offset to be less. A figure is made to support this argument [SNR_diff_freq_diff_M.pdf](uploads/bc87af98a6b2474e342f3f5b97ff1781/SNR_diff_freq_diff_M.pdf).
**Comments:**
......