siqm-post-o3a-plans.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ To assess how the presence of a non-BH compact object with spin-induced deformat
 
 [This paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.06729) argued that if $\\delta\\kappa > 20$, then BBH template banks might miss them. We need to revisit this with more realistic settings such as IMR waveforms and low spin events etc.
 
-Knowing the edges of the parameter space of detectable binaries is extremely important in the inference of kappa. Right now we use a wide parameter space that spans to regions that will not have detectable SNR. This will add unwanted Occam's penalty into the Bayes factors, eventually leading to the BBH fraction estimates. 
+Knowing the edges of the parameter space of detectable binaries is extremely important in the inference of kappa. Right now we use a wide parameter space that spans to regions that will not have detectable SNR. This will add unwanted Occam's penalty into the Bayes factors, eventually leading to the BBH fraction estimates.
 
 #### The systematics study should cover the following:
 
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Knowing the edges of the parameter space of detectable binaries is extremely imp
 ### Milestones
 
 * Pankaj and Sajad: Read the population paper (method part and appendix) and schedule a meeting with Krishnendu/Saleem
-* 
+* Set up injections that are simple (Aligned spin, high spin magnitude, zero noise, k1=k2) and analyze with Ks>=0 prior. 
 
 # Deriving constraints that can be used to constrain the BH mimicker parameter space