|
|
## Attendance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan, Deirdre, Soumen, Sayantani, Parthapratim, Poulomi, Saleem, Sathya, Arun and Ish
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Agenda
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Minutes
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Minute taker: Ish
|
|
|
- Minutes from last call: [link](https://git.ligo.org/sayantani.datta/pca_tgr/-/wikis/June%2030,%202023)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sayantani- Ran into some troubles with the GR injections, so showing the non-GR results right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combining non-GR injections- Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ish- In the plot, phi_cap_PCA_6 gives a value other than 0. Is that okay?
|
|
|
- Sayantani- Since most of the information is contained in the first two parameters and all the noise is dumped into the latter. So, we should not even look at these parameters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combining non-GR injections- Heirarchial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arun- How close is the obtained Gaussian distribution with the injected one?
|
|
|
- Sayatani- The mu parameter will not have a meaning for a power-law distribution, but sigma seems to be consistent with what is expected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sathya- It is interesting that while all the injected deviation parameters are +ve, when you construct the PCA parameters, some of them are +ve and some are -ve. But we don't see a trend (right now). Need to dig deeper into this.
|
|
|
- Jan- Completely fine in principle, as PCA parameters are just linear transformations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Action items
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Need to explain the positive and negative-ness of the PCA parameters. |
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |