Additional-Review-(marginalization-over-joint-population+EoS-uncertainty).md

@@ -85,10 +85,10 @@ Previous results are stored [here](https://git.ligo.org/reed.essick/o3-nsbh-mmax
 
 Below, I compare the main output of the calculation: the probability that an object is consistent with a NS. Links point to where the (old/new) results are stored. I provide a comparison to all previous results computed for both GW200105 and GW200115.
 
-**WRITE A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF CONCLUSIONS**
+In brief, I find
 
-  * we have excellent agreement when the mass, spin, redshift distributions are exactly known
-  * we see statistically significant (but scientifically inconsequental?) differences when we additionally marginalize over uncertainty in the population. But we're confident the "new way" is the most correct way to do the calculation...
+  * excellent agreement when the mass, spin, redshift distributions are exactly known (i.e., no marginalization over population parameters)
+  * statistically significant (but scientifically inconsequental) differences when we additionally marginalize over uncertainty in the population. As described [above](#identified-bugs-and-associated-fixes), this is to be expected because of bugs in the previous version of the code.
 
 **GW200105 C01_PHMcombined_highspin**