@@ -73,8 +73,9 @@ The correct sum is implemented within the updated code [here](https://git.ligo.o
...
@@ -73,8 +73,9 @@ The correct sum is implemented within the updated code [here](https://git.ligo.o
This difference can cause discrepencies between the old and the new code when there is a nontrivial marginalization over the population (i.e., when there is more than a single population sample `\Lambda_p`).
This difference can cause discrepencies between the old and the new code when there is a nontrivial marginalization over the population (i.e., when there is more than a single population sample `\Lambda_p`).
These can be much larger than the statistical uncertainty from the finite number of Monte Carlo samples (see [below](#comparison-to-previous-results)), but have never been large enough to change the scientific conclusions drawn. Furthermore, [ApJ 915 L5 (2021)](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ac082e) only reported results assuming a fixed population (flat in source-frame component masses) and therefore this issue did not affect the published results.
These can be much larger than the statistical uncertainty from the finite number of Monte Carlo samples (see [below](#comparison-to-previous-results)), but have never been large enough to change the scientific conclusions drawn. Furthermore, [ApJ 915 L5 (2021)](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ac082e) only reported results assuming a fixed population (flat in source-frame component masses) and therefore this issue did not affect the published results.