Home.md

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ We performed a set of investigations on the analysis to check its accuracy.  Bel
 
 | Reviewer| Task  | Status | Link to review material | Persons Responsible | Comment | final sign-off |
 | ------ | ------ |--------|-------------------------|---------------------|---------------|----------------|
-| [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Choice on ending frequency of the $`22-`$mode track   |  To be updated  |      [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/wikis/overelap33) |    Soumen |  The clean separation between the tracks for different $`m`$ that one obtains in the early inspiral breaks down in the late inspiral, approaching merger. Thus, this analysis must be restricted to times/frequencies sufficiently before the merger. To find an appropriate cutoff, the developers computed the overlap between $S(\alpha)$s for the 22 and 33 modes for various choices of ending frequency. They found that for an ending frequency of the 22 mode below 0.6*F_isco, the overlap is < 0.2% for both the events |   Nathan: :x: , Haris: :heavy_check_mark:  | 
+| [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Choice on ending frequency of the $`22-`$mode track   |  To be updated  |      [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/wikis/overelap33) |    Soumen |  The clean separation between the tracks for different $`m`$ that one obtains in the early inspiral breaks down in the late inspiral, approaching merger. Thus, this analysis must be restricted to times/frequencies sufficiently before the merger. To find an appropriate cutoff, the developers computed the overlap between $S(\alpha)$s for the 22 and 33 modes for various choices of ending frequency. They found that for an ending frequency of the 22 mode below 0.6*F_isco, the overlap is < 0.2% for both the events. |   Nathan: :x: , Haris: :heavy_check_mark:  | 
 | [Haris K](https://git.ligo.org/haris-k), [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Comparison of PSDs between Welch and BayesLine  |  DONE |      [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/wikis/PSDs-comparison) |    Soumen |   Haris: PSDs look consistent for detection purposes. Nathan: PSDs are not exactly the same, but have the same general amplitude. However, the GW190814 BayesLine PSD appears to be from 60 Hz-subtracted data, while the Welch PSD for that event and both PSDs for GW190412 have the 60 Hz line present. This should be sorted out.  |    Nathan: :x:, Haris: :heavy_check_mark: | 
 | [Haris K](https://git.ligo.org/haris-k), [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Study on choice of deltaT and deltaF  | Done |      [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/-/wikis/Study-on-choice-of-deltaT-and-deltaF) |    Soumen             |   $`Y(\alpha)`$ is defined as the sum of energy content of the pixels along the $`\alpha`$ track. Thus it will depend on the pixel size. However, the final $`\beta`$ does not depend strongly on the choice of pixel size. Further, for sample rates <= 4096 Hz, the spectrograms seem to be consistent for various choices of the sampling rate. The analysis is restricted to  sample rates <= 4096 Hz.   |   :heavy_check_mark:   |
 | [Haris K](https://git.ligo.org/haris-k), [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Study on $`p-`$value  |  Done |      [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/-/wikis/Study-on-p-value) | Soumen  |  Extrapolation of $`P(\beta\|H_0)`$ doesn't seem to be a good idea. Will use background samples to quote an upper bound on *p*-value |  :heavy_check_mark: |