| ... | ... | @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ Below is the summary of investigations to test the S190412m results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer| Task | Status | Link to review material | Persons Responsible | Comment | final sign-off |
|
|
|
|
| ------ | ------ |--------|-------------------------|---------------------|---------------|----------------|
|
|
|
|
| [Haris K](https://git.ligo.org/haris-k), [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Analysis of GW190412 with PE samples as templates | Done | [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/-/wikis/Distribution-of-on-source-beta) | Soumen | Haris: It is evident from the $`\beta`$ histogram that using MaxL value of parameters as template is not an optimal way. Alternatively, we need to marginalize $`\beta`$ over templates from constructed from samples. This analysis is done without data quality flags. | :heavy_check_mark: |
|
|
|
|
| [Haris K](https://git.ligo.org/haris-k), [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Analysis of GW190412 with PE samples as templates | Done | [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/-/wikis/Distribution-of-on-source-beta) | Soumen | It is evident from the $`\beta`$ histogram that using MaxL value of parameters as template is not an optimal way. Alternatively, we need to marginalize $`\beta`$ over templates from constructed from samples. This analysis is done without data quality flags. | :heavy_check_mark: |
|
|
|
|
| [Haris K](https://git.ligo.org/haris-k), [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Injection study for GW190412 event using C00 and C01 data | Done | [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/-/wikis/injection-Study-for-S190412m-event) | Soumen | This exercise is done with latest version of scripts. We note that the event $`\beta`$ value is on the higher tail of the distribution of $`\beta`$s obtained from the injection campaign. This might come from using the same maxL PE results regardless of the background noise. We suggest investigating this in the future. Further, we observe that the distribution of $\beta$ for h_22+h_33 injections and h_33(residual) injections are consistent. | :heavy_check_mark: |
|
|
|
|
| [Haris K](https://git.ligo.org/haris-k), [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Injection study using NR waveform | Done | [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/wikis/Injection-study-using-NR-waveorm) | Soumen | [This exercise is done with an slightly different definition of $`Y(\alpha)`$ or $`\tilde X(\tau,f)`$. See the first bullet point in the [**page**](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/-/wikis/Study-on-choice-of-deltaT-and-deltaF) for details.] This investigation is done to understand why the event $`\beta`$ value is on the higher tail of the distribution of $`\beta`$s obtained from the injection campaign with SEOBNRv4HM templates. In this simulation, we observe that the distribution of $`\beta`$s shifted towards the right compared to SEOBNRv4HM injections. However, this is likely due to larger SNR of the NR injections (25), compared to the SEOBNRv4HM injections (15) and the event. | :heavy_check_mark: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ... | ... | |
