| ... | ... | @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ We performed a set of investigations on the analysis to check its accuracy. Bel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer| Task | Status | Link to review material | Persons Responsible | Comment | final sign-off |
|
|
|
|
| ------ | ------ |--------|-------------------------|---------------------|---------------|----------------|
|
|
|
|
| [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Choice on ending frequency of the $`22-`$mode track | To be updated | [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/wikis/overelap33) | Soumen | Haris: for S190412m the overlaps between $`S(\alpha)`$ for 22 and 33 modes are well below 1% for ending frequencies<0.6f_ISCO. We need to check for S190814bv also. | Nathan: :x: , Haris: :x: |
|
|
|
|
| [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Choice on ending frequency of the $`22-`$mode track | To be updated | [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/wikis/overelap33) | Soumen | Haris: for S190412m the overlaps between $`S(\alpha)`$ for 22 and 33 modes are well below 1% for ending frequencies<0.6f_ISCO for both events.. | Nathan: :x: , Haris: :heavy_check_mark: |
|
|
|
|
| [Haris K](https://git.ligo.org/haris-k), [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Comparison of PSDs between Welch and BayesLine | DONE | [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/wikis/PSDs-comparison) | Soumen | Haris: PSDs look consistent for detection purposes. Nathan: PSDs are not exactly the same, but have the same general amplitude. However, the GW190814 BayesLine PSD appears to be from 60 Hz-subtracted data, while the Welch PSD for that event and both PSDs for GW190412 have the 60 Hz line present. This should be sorted out. | Nathan: :x:, Haris: :heavy_check_mark: |
|
|
|
|
| [Haris K](https://git.ligo.org/haris-k), [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Study on choice of deltaT and deltaF | Done | [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/-/wikis/Study-on-choice-of-deltaT-and-deltaF) | Soumen | $`Y(\alpha)`$ is defined as the sum of energy content of the pixels along the $`\alpha`$ track. Thus it will depend on the pixel size. However, the final $`\beta`$ does not depend strongly on the choice of pixel size. Further, for sample rates <= 4096 Hz, the spectrograms seem to be consistent for various choices of the sampling rate. The analysis is restricted to sample rates <= 4096 Hz. | :heavy_check_mark: |
|
|
|
|
| [Haris K](https://git.ligo.org/haris-k), [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Study on $`p-`$value | Done | [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/-/wikis/Study-on-p-value) | Soumen | Extrapolation of $`P(\beta\|H_0)`$ doesn't seem to be a good idea. Will use background samples to quote an upper bound on *p*-value | :heavy_check_mark: |
|
| ... | ... | @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ Below is the summary of investigations to test the S190412m results. |
|
|
|
| Reviewer| Task | Status | Link to review material | Persons Responsible | Comment | final sign-off |
|
|
|
|
| ------ | ------ |--------|-------------------------|---------------------|---------------|----------------|
|
|
|
|
| [Haris K](https://git.ligo.org/haris-k), [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Analysis of GW190412 with PE samples as templates | In progress | [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/-/wikis/Distribution-of-on-source-beta) | Soumen | Haris: It is evident from the $`\beta`$ histogram that using MaxL value of parameters as template is not an optimal way. Alternatively, we need to marginalize $`\beta`$ over templates from constructed from samples. | Nathan: :x: , Haris: :x: |
|
|
|
|
| [Haris K](https://git.ligo.org/haris-k), [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Injection study for GW190412 event using C00 and C01 data | Done | [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/-/wikis/injection-Study-for-S190412m-event) | Soumen | This exercise is done with an slightly different definition of $`Y(\alpha)`$ or $`\tilde X(\tau,f)`$. See the first bullet point in this [**page**](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/-/wikis/Study-on-choice-of-deltaT-and-deltaF) for details. However, we note that the event $`\beta`$ value is on the higher tail of the distribution of $`\beta`$s obtained from the injection campaign. This might come from using the same maxL PE results regardless of the background noise. We suggest investigating this in the future. | :heavy_check_mark: |
|
|
|
|
| [Haris K](https://git.ligo.org/haris-k), [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Injection study for GW190412 event using C00 and C01 data | Done | [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/-/wikis/injection-Study-for-S190412m-event) | Soumen | This exercise is done with an slightly different definition of $`Y(\alpha)`$ or $`\tilde X(\tau,f)`$. See the first bullet point in this [**page**](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/-/wikis/Study-on-choice-of-deltaT-and-deltaF) for details. However, we note that the event $`\beta`$ value is on the higher tail of the distribution of $`\beta`$s obtained from the injection campaign. This might come from using the same maxL PE results regardless of the background noise. We suggest investigating this in the future. Further, we observe that the distribution of $\beta$ for h_22+h_33 injections and h_33(residual) injections are consistent. | :heavy_check_mark: |
|
|
|
|
| [Haris K](https://git.ligo.org/haris-k), [Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel](https://git.ligo.org/nathan-johnson-mcdaniel) | Injection study using NR waveform | Done | [Link](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/wikis/Injection-study-using-NR-waveorm) | Soumen | [This exercise is done with an slightly different definition of $`Y(\alpha)`$ or $`\tilde X(\tau,f)`$. See the first bullet point in the [**page**](https://git.ligo.org/soumen.roy/o3inspiralhom/-/wikis/Study-on-choice-of-deltaT-and-deltaF) for details.] This investigation is done to understand why the event $`\beta`$ value is on the higher tail of the distribution of $`\beta`$s obtained from the injection campaign with SEOBNRv4HM templates. In this simulation, we observe that the distribution of $`\beta`$s shifted towards the right compared to SEOBNRv4HM injections. However, this is likely due to larger SNR of the NR injections (25), compared to the SEOBNRv4HM injections (15) and the event. Nathan: Can the iPython notebook linked from this page be put in the Git repository or somewhere else where it will render in your browser? | Nathan: :x:, Haris: :heavy_check_mark: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ... | ... | |
