... | ... | @@ -72,10 +72,8 @@ The effective-rank of the covariance matrix needs to be tuned for each event usi |
|
|
|
|
|
## Rank versus $`\beta`$ for off-source samples
|
|
|
|
|
|
<img src="uploads/ee3220c8ccfdadccb2ce300d4142ff05/beta_lambda_nalpha_6_.png" width="440" >
|
|
|
<img src="uploads/a8b1afe3e766555b8a602cfad4354d10/beta_lambda_nalpha_5_.png" width="440" >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<img src="uploads/e37b0ac160bb258219a1b6732dbb2308/beta_lambda_nalpha_4_.png" width="440" >
|
|
|
<img src="uploads/27ac1831fe2b94185cc51bcdba11d53c/beta_lambda_nalpha_3_.png" width="440" >
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above figuers show the variation in $`\beta`$ with respect to the rank of the covariance matrix for off-source samples. The plots are produced using the off-source samples obtained for maximum likelihood samples which are reported in the above tables.
|
|
|
The above figures show the variation in $`\beta`$ with respect to the rank of the covariance matrix for off-source samples. The plots are produced using the off-source samples obtained for maximum likelihood samples which are reported in the above tables.
|
|
|
|