Issues-with-covaraince-matrix.md

@@ -100,4 +100,4 @@ Here, we show the variation in $`\beta`$ due to the different choices of the ran
 <img src="uploads/ea71de0d1e38b3518b6ffe925b81c0c5/inj_beta_rank_gw190412_1_.png"  width="440" >
 <img src="uploads/eaa22d5905eaf85dda3d5ce9f602f3fc/inj_beta_rank_gw190814.png"  width="440" >
 
-The black dashed trace shows the median, which increases rapidly for both the events for the first few basis vectors, and then it increases slowly. This feature is similar to the $`\gamma`$ versus rank plot. The $`\beta`(Index)$ in the region of less important basis vectors becomes oscillatory. But the $`\beta`(Index)$  of GW190814 is less oscillatory then the case of GW190412. It happens due to the fact that m=3 multipole in GW190814 is quite stronger than the Gw190412 event.
+The black dashed trace shows the median, which increases rapidly for both the events for the first few basis vectors, and then it increases slowly. This feature is similar to the $`\gamma`$ versus rank plot. The $`\beta(Index)`$ in the region of less important basis vectors becomes oscillatory. But the $`\beta`(Index)$  of GW190814 is less oscillatory then the case of GW190412. It happens due to the fact that m=3 multipole in GW190814 is quite stronger than the Gw190412 event.
\ No newline at end of file