... | @@ -81,10 +81,14 @@ The above figures show the variation in $`\beta`$ for off-source samples with re |
... | @@ -81,10 +81,14 @@ The above figures show the variation in $`\beta`$ for off-source samples with re |
|
<img src="uploads/b79e18a4ee6bd247d58d3aab806b8178/rank_gamma_gw190412_2_.png" width="440" >
|
|
<img src="uploads/b79e18a4ee6bd247d58d3aab806b8178/rank_gamma_gw190412_2_.png" width="440" >
|
|
<img src="uploads/7d12acced7e7ff9ab2b947bad9bfca07/rank_gamma_gw190814_1_.png" width="440" >
|
|
<img src="uploads/7d12acced7e7ff9ab2b947bad9bfca07/rank_gamma_gw190814_1_.png" width="440" >
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above figures show the variation in $`\gamma`$ with respect to the rank of the covariance matrix for off-source samples. The intrinsic parameter of maximum likelihood samples (reported in the above tables) are used to produce the plots.
|
|
The above figures show the variation in $`\gamma`$ with respect to the rank of the covariance matrix for off-source samples. The intrinsic parameters of the maximum likelihood sample (reported in the above tables) are used to produce the plots.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## LLR22 versus rank
|
|
## LLR22 versus rank
|
|
|
|
|
|
<img src="uploads/a2d44c117101b73d3feb36e291514f3e/LLR22_lambda_onsource_gw190412.png" width="440" >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The figure show the variation of LLR22 versus the rank of the covariance matrix. These results produced using the 5 largest likelihood samples. |
|
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |
|
<img src="uploads/01ea636c0ee3913120028163d714bda0/LLR22_lambda_onsource_gw190412_1_.png" width="440" >
|
|
|
|
<img src="uploads/37318e5408bace5c9cc7473122233cbd/LLR22_lambda_onsource_gw190814.png" width="440" >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The figures show the variation of LLR22 versus the rank of the covariance matrix. These results produced using the 5 largest likelihood samples. The intrinsic parameter these samples are reported in the above tables. |
|
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |