Visually inspect the A posteriors to see if everything looks OK. Things to look out for: is GR recovered (within or close to 90% CI represented by vertical lines); weird posterior shape (like double peaks); how it compares to gwtc3 posterior (about the same, better, worse).
Visually inspect the A posteriors to see if everything looks OK. Things to look out for: is GR recovered (within or close to 90% CI represented by vertical lines); weird posterior shape (like double peaks); how it compares to gwtc3 posterior (about the same, better, worse).
Plots last updated 7th November 2023.
Plots last updated 7th November 2023. They can all be found [here](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/\~tomasz.baka/mdr_plots/)
I propose following key for filling in the table (you can include brief text note after the symbol if you want to elaborate). Use 2 symbols. 1st represents how bilby posterior looks:
I propose following key for filling in the table (you can include brief text note after the symbol if you want to elaborate). Use 2 symbols. 1st represents how bilby posterior looks:
* :white_check_mark: nice single peak and GR recovered [`:white_check_mark:`]
* :ok: GR recovered but posterior looks weird (2nd peak, very broad, etc.) [`:ok:`]
* :x: GR not recovered (A=0 significantly beyond 90% CI) [`:x:`]
2nd symbol represents how well does bilby posterior compare to gwtc3 one:
* :arrow_up: bilby has noticebly better posterior (narrower, 2nd peaks damped/removed, closer to GR) [`:arrow_up:`]
* :arrow_down_small: bilby is noticeably worse (wider, more 2nd peaks, farther from GR) [`:arrow_down_small:`]
* :neutral_face: both posteriors look more or less the same [`:neutral_face:`]
<table>
* :white_check_mark: nice single peak and GR recovered \[`:white_check_mark:`\]
* :ok: GR recovered but posterior looks weird (2nd peak, very broad, etc.) \[`:ok:`\]
* :x: GR not recovered (A=0 significantly beyond 90% CI) \[`:x:`\] 2nd symbol represents how well does bilby posterior compare to gwtc3 one:
* :arrow_up: bilby has noticebly better posterior (narrower, 2nd peaks damped/removed, closer to GR) \[`:arrow_up:`\]
* :arrow_down_small: bilby is noticeably worse (wider, more 2nd peaks, farther from GR) \[`:arrow_down_small:`\]
* :neutral_face: both posteriors look more or less the same \[`:neutral_face:`\]
[link](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/\~tomasz.baka/mdr_plots/GW191129_134029/posterior_mdr_alpha3p0_GW191129_134029.png) :ok: :neutral_face: GR bit outside 90%
[link](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/\~tomasz.baka/mdr_plots/GW191129_134029/posterior_mdr_alpha3p5_GW191129_134029.png) :ok::neutral_face: GR bit outside 90%
