O3b-Results/Comparison-between-lal_inference-and-bilby.md

+## Comparison between the bilby and lal_inference versions
+
+| Event | alpha | link |
+| ------ | ------ | ------ |
+| GW200208A | 1.5 | [link](#gw200208a-alpha15) |
+| GW200224B | 1.5 | [link](#gw200224b-alpha15) |
+| GW191222A | 1.5 | [link](#gw191222a-alpha15) |
+|  | 2.5 | [link](#gw191222a-alpha25) |
+|  | 3.0 | [link](#gw191222a-alpha30) |
+|  | 3.5 | [link](#gw191222a-alpha35) |
+|  | 4.0 | [link](#gw191222a-alpha40) |
+
+## GW200208A
+### GW200208A alpha=1.5
+![image](uploads/b9b86944f92d35eb15d7132f5c747368/image.png)
+## GW200224B
+## GW200224B alpha=1.5
+![image](uploads/9cf6f2bd44057262da6a83d6a4308458/image.png)
+## GW191222A
+### GW191222A alpha=1.5
+
+#### log_lambda_eff sampling mode
+
+Here is the comparison of the posterior for log_lambda_eff obtained in lal_inference and obtained in bilby![compare_lal_bilby](uploads/64e0a5cf7ea06ea7894d26833a56613b/compare_lal_bilby.png)
+
+#### test of log(A_eff) sampling mode
+
+![image](uploads/c8506d778e99270077eee4c2f2460f9b/image.png)
+
+### GW191222A alpha=2.5
+Investigate why 2 parallel runs have not produced posteriors.
+![image](uploads/4f509253e2ef314fe017d05b44202df0/image.png)
+
+### GW191222A alpha=3.0
+![image](uploads/4ee0ed12726694e50e6625d6db26d6ac/image.png)
+
+### GW191222A alpha=3.5
+![image](uploads/d3cd2068dd8986b789e980d7cf2a6bd3/image.png)
+
+
+
+### GW191222A alpha=4.0
+![image](uploads/a73974af15d5446c776a905479bcfd80/image.png)
\ No newline at end of file