commented on
merge request !104
"Add evidence to popsummary"
at
RatesAndPopulations / GWPopulation Pipe
oops, unmarked it
-
36537b25 · Add evidence to popsummary
commented on
merge request !104
"Add evidence to popsummary"
at
RatesAndPopulations / GWPopulation Pipe
@jacob.golomb we're just waiting for this to be no marked as draft.
commented on
merge request !104
"Add evidence to popsummary"
at
RatesAndPopulations / GWPopulation Pipe
Looks good to me
commented on
merge request !102
"Draft: ENH: improve jitting of key functions"
at
RatesAndPopulations / GWPopulation Pipe
This breaks the rate construction for some reason, presumably something is being unsafely cached.
-
68824f8f · Added model.prob before jitting
accepted
merge request
!103
"Added model.prob before jitting"
at
RatesAndPopulations / GWPopulation Pipe
commented on
merge request !103
"Added model.prob before jitting"
at
RatesAndPopulations / GWPopulation Pipe
This looks good to me, I would count this as a user error for gwpopulation on our side.
approved
merge request
!103
"Added model.prob before jitting"
at
RatesAndPopulations / GWPopulation Pipe
opened
merge request
!103
"Added model.prob before jitting"
at
RatesAndPopulations / GWPopulation Pipe
commented on
merge request !102
"Draft: ENH: improve jitting of key functions"
at
RatesAndPopulations / GWPopulation Pipe
Looks ok to me!
approved
merge request
!102
"Draft: ENH: improve jitting of key functions"
at
RatesAndPopulations / GWPopulation Pipe
-
830008e2 · BUG: make jit wrapper less ubiquitous
opened
merge request
!102
"Draft: ENH: improve jitting of key functions"
at
RatesAndPopulations / GWPopulation Pipe
-
177be644 · ENH: improve jitting of key functions
commented on
issue #32
"Post-processing stages are very slow"
at
RatesAndPopulations / GWPopulation Pipe
A potential solution...