Classification is defined incorrectly

In https://emfollow.docs.ligo.org/userguide/analysis/inference.html#classification

"The classification consists of four numbers, summing to unity, that give the probability that the source is either a BNS, NSBH, BBH merger, or is of Terrestrial (i.e. a background fluctuation or a glitch) origin."

The terms BNS, NSBH, BBH link to definitions that DO NOT AGREE with the classification as I have previously seen it. The classification categories are based on a border of 3.0 solar masses. While objects less that 3.0 solar masses may be neutron stars, they are not necessarily neutron stars.

The terms are also inconsistent with HasNS.