Add HIGH_PROFILE explanation

Description

Fixes #389 (closed).

Added an explanation about HIGH_PROFILE label in vetting.rst as well as glossary. Added a line to change log.

Checklist

Thanks for your contribution! Please complete and check off the following quality control tasks.

Changes:

• I created this merge request from my own fork and from a branch other than main or master.
• I checked that the CI pipeline completes without errors (except for linkcheck).
• I added a change log entry (or this is a minor change that does not require a change log entry).

Whitespace:

• No line that I added ends with trailing whitespace.
• Every file that I modified ends with one blank line.

Grammar and spelling:

• I proofread my contribution and made sure that it is free from spelling and grammatical errors.
• I used American English rather than British English spelling.
• I used the Oxford (serial) comma in lists of three or more items.
• I minimized use of the passive voice.

Figures and code:

• I contributed plot directive code to generate figures (or I did not contribute any figures).
• I contributed Python code that conforms to the PEP 8 style guide (or I did not contribute Python code).

assigned to @keita.kawabe

mentioned in issue #389 (closed)

• I would make candidate and public alert singular in the paragraph !292 (diffs).
• Line !292 (diffs) has Superevent and super event.
• The sentence !292 (diffs) doesn't look complete to me.
• In the sentence !292 (diffs), I would remove for RRT's internal purposes given that the label is public at the end.
• !292 (diffs): I would write In rare cases, RRT might apply manually the HIGH_PROFILE label to superevents (...).
• !292 (diffs): I would add commas around with an accompanying GCN Circular.
• !292 (diffs): will be -> is.

Thanks for working on this, Keita. Below are my editing suggestions for the file vetting.rst. Some of these duplicate what Nicolas wrote above.

• "in a Superevent" --> "in a superevent"
• "even whether or not" --> "whether or not"
• "in the super event" --> "in the superevent"
• ":term:CBC trigger is preferred" --> "A :term:CBC trigger is preferred"
• "AND is likelier to be of astrophysical origin" --> "AND has less than 0.5 probability of being terrestrial"
• "Probability that the amount of neutron star material remained outside the final remnant compact object is larger than 0.1" --> "Probability that some neutron star material remains outside the final black hole remnant is larger than 0.1"
• "than 100 degrees squared" --> "than 100 square degrees"
• "As soon as one of" --> "If one of"
• "one of these condition" --> "one of these conditions"
• "even when the candidate is retracted" --> "even if the candidate is retracted"

added 1 commit

• cfada878 - Grammatical/spelling errors were fixed.

Compare with previous version

Thanks @nicolas.arnaud and @peter-shawhan. I believe that all of your points were addressed.

marked the checklist item I contributed plot directive code to generate figures (or I did not contribute any figures). as completed

marked the checklist item I contributed Python code that conforms to the PEP 8 style guide (or I did not contribute Python code). as completed

marked the checklist item I proofread my contribution and made sure that it is free from spelling and grammatical errors. as completed

marked the checklist item I used American English rather than British English spelling. as completed

I am worried that this text may be a bit hard to follow because we have so many similar-sounding concepts: high profile events, significant events, preferred events. Is there anything that you can do to clarify the relationship between these concepts?

resolved all threads

added 1 commit

• 6ee83f45 - vetting.rst:

Compare with previous version