Fix an error in the coating brownian noise calculation
A discrepancy was found by Gabriele Vajente between the gwinc CTN calculation and several other codes, especially in the case of large Poisson ratio in the coating.
See: https://git.ligo.org/gabriele-vajente/thermal-noise-models
This commit resolves the discrepancy by fixing an apparent error in the Yam et al calculation that was implemented in gwinc.
Merge request reports
Activity
added noise label
Attaching a jupyter notebook that reproduces the calculation.
- Resolved by Jameson Rollins
The equation being changed is from equation (1) in doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.042002. Is the conclusion now that this equation is wrong?
- Automatically resolved by Christopher Wipf
added 1 commit
- 84791178 - Fix an error in the coating brownian noise calculation
@christopher.wipf you want to followup with a separate MR to update the test cache?
I want to figure out a better way to handle MR that change noise curves. We want to generate the report that shows the change, but then not have to go through a separate step to update. Open to suggestions...
Edited by Jameson Rollinsmentioned in merge request !78 (merged)
added 36 commits
-
84791178...a5f2d45e - 35 commits from branch
master
- 8d3962e4 - Fix an error in the coating brownian noise calculation
-
84791178...a5f2d45e - 35 commits from branch
added 7 commits
-
8d3962e4...131d6887 - 6 commits from branch
master
- a813f541 - Fix an error in the coating brownian noise calculation
-
8d3962e4...131d6887 - 6 commits from branch
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for a813f541 succeeds
mentioned in commit fc21470a