`theta_jn` and `iota`
A discussion arose in !266 (merged) that we interchangeably use iota
and theta_jn
. I believe iota
is typically referred to in most publications, but perhaps internally theta_jn
is inline with lalsimulation (correct me if I'm wrong).
Marking this issue as a point of discussion how we should handle this. Currently, iota
is the user-facing parameter, but internally we refer to theta_jn
. What are peoples thought? Happy with it as-is or should we change wholesale?