Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

detailed tutorial for open data

Merged Virginia d'Emilio requested to merge virginia.demilio/bilby:detailed_tutorial into master

The tutorial is based on GW150914.py, with the addition of more in depth comments. The code has been adapted to be used for other LOSC events, i.e. all arguments are explicitly specified (e.g. interferometer_names, sample_rate, npoints..), so that they can be easily edited by the user.

Edited by Gregory Ashton

Merge request reports

Loading
Loading

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
  • Hi @virginia.demilio, I resolved the WIP status as you said it is good to go. This is looking good and gives a more complete description of working with the open data, thanks for the input.

    One thing before I'm happy to approve this: it needs to be moved to the open_data_examples (since it isn't an injection study) and potentially renamed. In that directory, we have GW150914.py which shows how to run on GW150914. Could you rename this GW150914_advanced.py? Or something to that effect?

    We might eventually want to have an example which instead shows a triple detector run, but we can leave that for the future.

  • Virginia d'Emilio resolved all discussions

    resolved all discussions

  • added 1 commit

    • 46d6e2a6 - Removing "comparison with Lalinference" reference and changing file name.

    Compare with previous version

  • Hi @gregory.ashton, I've removed the reference to LALInference and changed the file name to GW150914_advanced.py. The file is already located in the example/open_data_examples directory. Thank you very much for your feedback!

  • Great @virginia.demilio sorry, I must have got confused about where it as located! My bad.

  • Gregory Ashton approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Matthew David Pitkin approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Please register or sign in to reply
    Loading