Project restructuring
There are still some issues to be resolved on the branch. Some additional suggestions are:
- The hyperparameter likelihood isn't really a GW thing, it probably doesn't belong in the core either.
- The default functionality in prior should be in GW.
- The
test_redundancy
should be in GW. - I think references to
injection_parameters
in core should be changed totrue_parameters
for generality. -
Result.construct_cbc_derived_parameters
should be in gw/conversion, this is something I think I put in the wrong place.
Edited by Gregory Ashton
Merge request reports
Activity
added 1 commit
- 3d232daa - Fixed some of the issues that came up during restructuring
added 1 commit
- 1beecc10 - Fixed some of the issues that came up during restructuring
added 1 commit
- 616503aa - Fixed some of the issues that came up during restructuring
This all looks good to me. One final questions: should we have a
core
directory or just put the files on the top level?Having a
core
directory makes it clear why there is agw.prior
andcore.prior
. I think this argument sells it for me, but any one object before we merge? @colm.talbot @paul-lasky @moritz.huebner ?mentioned in issue #94 (closed)
added 2 commits
added 7 commits
-
63745698...cda72bcb - 6 commits from branch
master
- 08ad986a - Merge branch 'master' into 'project_restructuring'
-
63745698...cda72bcb - 6 commits from branch
@colm.talbot with regards to there being
gw
things incore
I'm planning to submit a MR in a bit to fix this. So we can merge and then do that later?mentioned in commit c11f1397
Please register or sign in to reply