Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

first iteration of __isub__ method in RankingStat

Merged Leo Tsukada requested to merge offline_new-workflow-rankingstat-isub into offline_new-workflow
All threads resolved!

Merge request reports

Pipeline #610904 passed

Pipeline passed for f962dd2f on offline_new-workflow-rankingstat-isub

Approval is optional

Merged by Prathamesh JoshiPrathamesh Joshi 11 months ago (Mar 24, 2024 6:18pm UTC)

Pipeline #610917 passed

Pipeline passed for f7baa119 on offline_new-workflow

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
  • Leo Tsukada added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    • ba92d904 - work around for subtraction of BinnedLnPDF class with sanity check of negative...

    Compare with previous version

  • Leo Tsukada added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    • 9e78c4b4 - work around for subtraction of BinnedLnPDF class with sanity check of negative...

    Compare with previous version

  • Leo Tsukada
  • Leo Tsukada added 2 commits

    added 2 commits

    • 67bf7131 - Introduce __isub__ method in RankingStat class
    • 4ef77cd9 - work around for subtraction of BinnedLnPDF class with sanity check of negative...

    Compare with previous version

  • Leo Tsukada added 62 commits

    added 62 commits

    • 4ef77cd9...5b3cae08 - 60 commits from branch offline_new-workflow
    • 93d057a2 - Introduce __isub__ method in RankingStat class
    • 0a2e5d29 - work around for subtraction of BinnedLnPDF class with sanity check of negative...

    Compare with previous version

  • Leo Tsukada added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    • f962dd2f - Introduce __isub__ method in RankingStat class

    Compare with previous version

  • Leo Tsukada resolved all threads

    resolved all threads

    • Author Maintainer
      Resolved by Leo Tsukada

      @prathamesh.joshi
      I realized this MR was not merged yet and had some conflict with upstream that needed a manual fix, so I did. are you good to get this merged to offline branch? Then, probably i would want to add a new entry in this review item list?

      Also, to make sure, I suppose this isub feature will be necessary for the final catalog rerank eventually to exclude bg samples from ER15, but we still need to modify the rerank workflow that actually does the bg subtraction based on given start or stop gps time, right? or have you made the dev yet?

  • Leo Tsukada resolved all threads

    resolved all threads

  • Please register or sign in to reply
    Loading