fix naming check for narrow-band SFTs with band < 1 Hz
Description
Simple fix for #645 (closed) just making the error check less strict (by checking the non-integer remnant field). Also adds another execution to the test script for this case, which for simplicity I've left at a simple "does not fail". Detailed per-bin comparisons are already done on the wider-band case.
API Changes and Justification
Backwards Compatible Changes
-
This change does not modify any class/function/struct/type definitions in a public C header file or any Python class/function definitions -
This change adds new classes/functions/structs/types to a public C header file or Python module
Backwards Incompatible Changes
-
This change modifies an existing class/function/struct/type definition in a public C header file or Python module -
This change removes an existing class/function/struct/type from a public C header file or Python module
If any of the Backwards Incompatible check boxes are ticked please provide a justification why this change is necessary and why it needs to be done in a backwards incompatible way.
Review Status
for @karl-wette to take a look when available again